Does anyone care about reviewstats?
There are open reviewstats changes [1] but the non-infra core team is entirely made up of people that no longer work on openstack [2]. I had a change that was open so long some of the projects are now owned by placement [3] so I just abandoned it. So the question is, does anyone use reviewstats anymore? If so, we should probably just start adding new people to the core team that actually use it. Otherwise we should probably just put it in the attic and rely on stackalytics (which is probably what most people are already doing). [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack-infra/reviewstats+status:... [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/893,members [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/499197/ -- Thanks, Matt
I would prefer to NOT rely upon the numbers reported by stackalytics because I loaded the same page in stackalytics and perceived a noticeable differences before and after the recent upgrade. Perhaps the path is to just add a couple people who would prefer to use it as reviewers and they will just need to be sure that they are able to leverage the tool as intended. For what it is worth, I was fairly unaware of this tool even though I've surely seen its reporting data before in the past. -Julia On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 7:05 AM Matt Riedemann <mriedemos@gmail.com> wrote:
There are open reviewstats changes [1] but the non-infra core team is entirely made up of people that no longer work on openstack [2]. I had a change that was open so long some of the projects are now owned by placement [3] so I just abandoned it.
So the question is, does anyone use reviewstats anymore? If so, we should probably just start adding new people to the core team that actually use it. Otherwise we should probably just put it in the attic and rely on stackalytics (which is probably what most people are already doing).
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack-infra/reviewstats+status:... [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/893,members [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/499197/
--
Thanks,
Matt
On 3/12/19 8:54 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
There are open reviewstats changes [1] but the non-infra core team is entirely made up of people that no longer work on openstack [2]. I had a change that was open so long some of the projects are now owned by placement [3] so I just abandoned it.
So the question is, does anyone use reviewstats anymore? If so, we should probably just start adding new people to the core team that actually use it. Otherwise we should probably just put it in the attic and rely on stackalytics (which is probably what most people are already doing).
I am still using it. I have a local change that pulls the project list from governance instead of the manually curated lists in reviewstats which reduces the maintenance burden somewhat. I'm not sure if it works for all projects though. I mostly use it for the Oslo stats these days and my all projects page hasn't been updated in almost two years. I suspect that's because of errors when it tries to process everything, but I haven't really dug into it. So I'm happy to push up my changes, but they may cause other people issues. Of course, given how out of date I suspect the project lists in reviewstats are I'm not sure how much worse I could make it. I doubt the numbers it spits out right now are terribly accurate anyway.
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack-infra/reviewstats+status:...
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/893,members [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/499197/
On 3/12/19 10:01 AM, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 3/12/19 8:54 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
There are open reviewstats changes [1] but the non-infra core team is entirely made up of people that no longer work on openstack [2]. I had a change that was open so long some of the projects are now owned by placement [3] so I just abandoned it.
So the question is, does anyone use reviewstats anymore? If so, we should probably just start adding new people to the core team that actually use it. Otherwise we should probably just put it in the attic and rely on stackalytics (which is probably what most people are already doing).
I am still using it. I have a local change that pulls the project list from governance instead of the manually curated lists in reviewstats which reduces the maintenance burden somewhat. I'm not sure if it works for all projects though. I mostly use it for the Oslo stats these days and my all projects page hasn't been updated in almost two years. I suspect that's because of errors when it tries to process everything, but I haven't really dug into it.
So I'm happy to push up my changes, but they may cause other people issues. Of course, given how out of date I suspect the project lists in reviewstats are I'm not sure how much worse I could make it. I doubt the numbers it spits out right now are terribly accurate anyway.
The stackalytics thread prompted me to clean this up and push it to gerrit: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/653024 It should help a lot with maintainability of the project lists, although I haven't investigated how many mismatches there are between the json files and governance. Probably a lot.
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack-infra/reviewstats+status:...
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/893,members [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/499197/
I do use it -----Original Message----- From: Ben Nemec <openstack@nemebean.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 2:35 PM To: openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: Does anyone care about reviewstats? [EXTERNAL EMAIL] On 3/12/19 10:01 AM, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 3/12/19 8:54 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
There are open reviewstats changes [1] but the non-infra core team is entirely made up of people that no longer work on openstack [2]. I had a change that was open so long some of the projects are now owned by placement [3] so I just abandoned it.
So the question is, does anyone use reviewstats anymore? If so, we should probably just start adding new people to the core team that actually use it. Otherwise we should probably just put it in the attic and rely on stackalytics (which is probably what most people are already doing).
I am still using it. I have a local change that pulls the project list from governance instead of the manually curated lists in reviewstats which reduces the maintenance burden somewhat. I'm not sure if it works for all projects though. I mostly use it for the Oslo stats these days and my all projects page hasn't been updated in almost two years. I suspect that's because of errors when it tries to process everything, but I haven't really dug into it.
So I'm happy to push up my changes, but they may cause other people issues. Of course, given how out of date I suspect the project lists in reviewstats are I'm not sure how much worse I could make it. I doubt the numbers it spits out right now are terribly accurate anyway.
The stackalytics thread prompted me to clean this up and push it to gerrit: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/653024 It should help a lot with maintainability of the project lists, although I haven't investigated how many mismatches there are between the json files and governance. Probably a lot.
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack-infra/reviewstats+ status:open
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/893,members [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/499197/
I use it but not for a regular basis at the moment. Do we have any kind of official place where its results are published? Regards, Ivan Kolodyazhny, http://blog.e0ne.info/ On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:22 AM <Arkady.Kanevsky@dell.com> wrote:
I do use it
-----Original Message----- From: Ben Nemec <openstack@nemebean.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 2:35 PM To: openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: Does anyone care about reviewstats?
[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
On 3/12/19 10:01 AM, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 3/12/19 8:54 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
There are open reviewstats changes [1] but the non-infra core team is entirely made up of people that no longer work on openstack [2]. I had a change that was open so long some of the projects are now owned by placement [3] so I just abandoned it.
So the question is, does anyone use reviewstats anymore? If so, we should probably just start adding new people to the core team that actually use it. Otherwise we should probably just put it in the attic and rely on stackalytics (which is probably what most people are already doing).
I am still using it. I have a local change that pulls the project list from governance instead of the manually curated lists in reviewstats which reduces the maintenance burden somewhat. I'm not sure if it works for all projects though. I mostly use it for the Oslo stats these days and my all projects page hasn't been updated in almost two years. I suspect that's because of errors when it tries to process everything, but I haven't really dug into it.
So I'm happy to push up my changes, but they may cause other people issues. Of course, given how out of date I suspect the project lists in reviewstats are I'm not sure how much worse I could make it. I doubt the numbers it spits out right now are terribly accurate anyway.
The stackalytics thread prompted me to clean this up and push it to gerrit: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/653024
It should help a lot with maintainability of the project lists, although I haven't investigated how many mismatches there are between the json files and governance. Probably a lot.
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack-infra/reviewstats+ status:open
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/893,members [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/499197/
Www. Stackayltics.com publish all types of stats:) Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 17, 2019, at 8:29 AM, Ivan Kolodyazhny <e0ne@e0ne.info> wrote:
I use it but not for a regular basis at the moment.
Do we have any kind of official place where its results are published?
Regards, Ivan Kolodyazhny, http://blog.e0ne.info/
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:22 AM <Arkady.Kanevsky@dell.com> wrote: I do use it
-----Original Message----- From: Ben Nemec <openstack@nemebean.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 2:35 PM To: openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: Does anyone care about reviewstats?
[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
On 3/12/19 10:01 AM, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 3/12/19 8:54 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
There are open reviewstats changes [1] but the non-infra core team is entirely made up of people that no longer work on openstack [2]. I had a change that was open so long some of the projects are now owned by placement [3] so I just abandoned it.
So the question is, does anyone use reviewstats anymore? If so, we should probably just start adding new people to the core team that actually use it. Otherwise we should probably just put it in the attic and rely on stackalytics (which is probably what most people are already doing).
I am still using it. I have a local change that pulls the project list from governance instead of the manually curated lists in reviewstats which reduces the maintenance burden somewhat. I'm not sure if it works for all projects though. I mostly use it for the Oslo stats these days and my all projects page hasn't been updated in almost two years. I suspect that's because of errors when it tries to process everything, but I haven't really dug into it.
So I'm happy to push up my changes, but they may cause other people issues. Of course, given how out of date I suspect the project lists in reviewstats are I'm not sure how much worse I could make it. I doubt the numbers it spits out right now are terribly accurate anyway.
The stackalytics thread prompted me to clean this up and push it to gerrit: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/653024
It should help a lot with maintainability of the project lists, although I haven't investigated how many mismatches there are between the json files and governance. Probably a lot.
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack-infra/reviewstats+ status:open
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/893,members [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/499197/
On 4/17/19 10:29 AM, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote:
I use it but not for a regular basis at the moment.
Do we have any kind of official place where its results are published?
Not that I know of. Russell used to run it on his site, but I think he changed it to redirect to stackalytics a while back. I publish my output to http://nemebean.com/reviewstats/ but it only includes the projects I am core on.
Regards, Ivan Kolodyazhny, http://blog.e0ne.info/
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:22 AM <Arkady.Kanevsky@dell.com <mailto:Arkady.Kanevsky@dell.com>> wrote:
I do use it
-----Original Message----- From: Ben Nemec <openstack@nemebean.com <mailto:openstack@nemebean.com>> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 2:35 PM To: openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org <mailto:openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: Does anyone care about reviewstats?
[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
On 3/12/19 10:01 AM, Ben Nemec wrote: > > > On 3/12/19 8:54 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: >> There are open reviewstats changes [1] but the non-infra core team is >> entirely made up of people that no longer work on openstack [2]. I >> had a change that was open so long some of the projects are now owned >> by placement [3] so I just abandoned it. >> >> So the question is, does anyone use reviewstats anymore? If so, we >> should probably just start adding new people to the core team that >> actually use it. Otherwise we should probably just put it in the >> attic and rely on stackalytics (which is probably what most people >> are already doing). > > I am still using it. I have a local change that pulls the project list > from governance instead of the manually curated lists in reviewstats > which reduces the maintenance burden somewhat. I'm not sure if it > works for all projects though. I mostly use it for the Oslo stats > these days and my all projects page hasn't been updated in almost two > years. I suspect that's because of errors when it tries to process > everything, but I haven't really dug into it. > > So I'm happy to push up my changes, but they may cause other people > issues. Of course, given how out of date I suspect the project lists > in reviewstats are I'm not sure how much worse I could make it. I > doubt the numbers it spits out right now are terribly accurate anyway.
The stackalytics thread prompted me to clean this up and push it to gerrit: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/653024
It should help a lot with maintainability of the project lists, although I haven't investigated how many mismatches there are between the json files and governance. Probably a lot.
> >> >> [1] >> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack-infra/reviewstats+ >> status:open >> >> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/893,members >> [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/499197/ >> >
We do need a single tool for all projects. -----Original Message----- From: Ben Nemec <openstack@nemebean.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 11:02 AM To: Ivan Kolodyazhny; OpenStack Discuss Subject: Re: Does anyone care about reviewstats? [EXTERNAL EMAIL] On 4/17/19 10:29 AM, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote:
I use it but not for a regular basis at the moment.
Do we have any kind of official place where its results are published?
Not that I know of. Russell used to run it on his site, but I think he changed it to redirect to stackalytics a while back. I publish my output to http://nemebean.com/reviewstats/ but it only includes the projects I am core on.
Regards, Ivan Kolodyazhny, http://blog.e0ne.info/
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:22 AM <Arkady.Kanevsky@dell.com <mailto:Arkady.Kanevsky@dell.com>> wrote:
I do use it
-----Original Message----- From: Ben Nemec <openstack@nemebean.com <mailto:openstack@nemebean.com>> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 2:35 PM To: openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org <mailto:openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: Does anyone care about reviewstats?
[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
On 3/12/19 10:01 AM, Ben Nemec wrote: > > > On 3/12/19 8:54 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: >> There are open reviewstats changes [1] but the non-infra core team is >> entirely made up of people that no longer work on openstack [2]. I >> had a change that was open so long some of the projects are now owned >> by placement [3] so I just abandoned it. >> >> So the question is, does anyone use reviewstats anymore? If so, we >> should probably just start adding new people to the core team that >> actually use it. Otherwise we should probably just put it in the >> attic and rely on stackalytics (which is probably what most people >> are already doing). > > I am still using it. I have a local change that pulls the project list > from governance instead of the manually curated lists in reviewstats > which reduces the maintenance burden somewhat. I'm not sure if it > works for all projects though. I mostly use it for the Oslo stats > these days and my all projects page hasn't been updated in almost two > years. I suspect that's because of errors when it tries to process > everything, but I haven't really dug into it. > > So I'm happy to push up my changes, but they may cause other people > issues. Of course, given how out of date I suspect the project lists > in reviewstats are I'm not sure how much worse I could make it. I > doubt the numbers it spits out right now are terribly accurate anyway.
The stackalytics thread prompted me to clean this up and push it to gerrit: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/653024
It should help a lot with maintainability of the project lists, although I haven't investigated how many mismatches there are between the json files and governance. Probably a lot.
> >> >> [1] >> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack-infra/reviewstats+ >> status:open >> >> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/893,members >> [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/499197/ >> >
+1 -----Original Message----- From: Kanevsky, Arkady Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 11:20 AM To: openstack@nemebean.com; e0ne@e0ne.info; openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org Subject: RE: Does anyone care about reviewstats? [EXTERNAL EMAIL] We do need a single tool for all projects. -----Original Message----- From: Ben Nemec <openstack@nemebean.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 11:02 AM To: Ivan Kolodyazhny; OpenStack Discuss Subject: Re: Does anyone care about reviewstats? [EXTERNAL EMAIL] On 4/17/19 10:29 AM, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote:
I use it but not for a regular basis at the moment.
Do we have any kind of official place where its results are published?
Not that I know of. Russell used to run it on his site, but I think he changed it to redirect to stackalytics a while back. I publish my output to http://nemebean.com/reviewstats/ but it only includes the projects I am core on.
Regards, Ivan Kolodyazhny, http://blog.e0ne.info/
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:22 AM <Arkady.Kanevsky@dell.com <mailto:Arkady.Kanevsky@dell.com>> wrote:
I do use it
-----Original Message----- From: Ben Nemec <openstack@nemebean.com <mailto:openstack@nemebean.com>> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 2:35 PM To: openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org <mailto:openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: Does anyone care about reviewstats?
[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
On 3/12/19 10:01 AM, Ben Nemec wrote: > > > On 3/12/19 8:54 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: >> There are open reviewstats changes [1] but the non-infra core team is >> entirely made up of people that no longer work on openstack [2]. I >> had a change that was open so long some of the projects are now owned >> by placement [3] so I just abandoned it. >> >> So the question is, does anyone use reviewstats anymore? If so, we >> should probably just start adding new people to the core team that >> actually use it. Otherwise we should probably just put it in the >> attic and rely on stackalytics (which is probably what most people >> are already doing). > > I am still using it. I have a local change that pulls the project list > from governance instead of the manually curated lists in reviewstats > which reduces the maintenance burden somewhat. I'm not sure if it > works for all projects though. I mostly use it for the Oslo stats > these days and my all projects page hasn't been updated in almost two > years. I suspect that's because of errors when it tries to process > everything, but I haven't really dug into it. > > So I'm happy to push up my changes, but they may cause other people > issues. Of course, given how out of date I suspect the project lists > in reviewstats are I'm not sure how much worse I could make it. I > doubt the numbers it spits out right now are terribly accurate anyway.
The stackalytics thread prompted me to clean this up and push it to gerrit: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/653024
It should help a lot with maintainability of the project lists, although I haven't investigated how many mismatches there are between the json files and governance. Probably a lot.
> >> >> [1] >> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack-infra/reviewstats+ >> status:open >> >> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/893,members >> [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/499197/ >> >
On 2019-03-12 08:54:13 -0500 (-0500), Matt Riedemann wrote: [...]
So the question is, does anyone use reviewstats anymore? If so, we should probably just start adding new people to the core team that actually use it. [...]
This sounds good to me. The Infra team doesn't really use it and is just providing a home for it, so adding interested users as new core reviewers makes plenty of sense. Officially, it's Clark's call as Infra PTL but I doubt he'd have any concerns either. -- Jeremy Stanley
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019, at 9:08 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2019-03-12 08:54:13 -0500 (-0500), Matt Riedemann wrote: [...]
So the question is, does anyone use reviewstats anymore? If so, we should probably just start adding new people to the core team that actually use it. [...]
This sounds good to me. The Infra team doesn't really use it and is just providing a home for it, so adding interested users as new core reviewers makes plenty of sense. Officially, it's Clark's call as Infra PTL but I doubt he'd have any concerns either.
No concerns here. Let me know if you need help bootstrapping the new reviewers. Happy to add people to get that rolling. Clark
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 08:54:13AM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote:
There are open reviewstats changes [1] but the non-infra core team is entirely made up of people that no longer work on openstack [2]. I had a change that was open so long some of the projects are now owned by placement [3] so I just abandoned it.
So the question is, does anyone use reviewstats anymore? If so, we should probably just start adding new people to the core team that actually use it. Otherwise we should probably just put it in the attic and rely on stackalytics (which is probably what most people are already doing).
I still use it and am running some local patches to make working with stable branches easier. I'd be happy to join a core team to maintain/improve it. Yours Tony.
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019, at 2:01 PM, Tony Breeds wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 08:54:13AM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote:
There are open reviewstats changes [1] but the non-infra core team is entirely made up of people that no longer work on openstack [2]. I had a change that was open so long some of the projects are now owned by placement [3] so I just abandoned it.
So the question is, does anyone use reviewstats anymore? If so, we should probably just start adding new people to the core team that actually use it. Otherwise we should probably just put it in the attic and rely on stackalytics (which is probably what most people are already doing).
I still use it and am running some local patches to make working with stable branches easier.
I'd be happy to join a core team to maintain/improve it.
Congratulations! as the first person to explicitly volunteer for this activity you've been added to the core group for reviewstats.
Yours Tony.
On 2019-03-12 17:47:35 -0400 (-0400), Clark Boylan wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019, at 2:01 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: [...]
I'd be happy to join a core team to maintain/improve it.
Congratulations! as the first person to explicitly volunteer for this activity you've been added to the core group for reviewstats.
The proportion of projects on which Tony is not a core reviewer, as a function of time, eventually approaches zero. -- Jeremy Stanley
I still use it and am running some local patches to make working with stable branches easier.
I'd be happy to join a core team to maintain/improve it.
Congratulations! as the first person to explicitly volunteer for this activity you've been added to the core group for reviewstats.
I'm another one that does use this for some things and has some local patches. Feel free to add me to the core list if you're updating it. I can try to give it a little attention from time to time. Sean
participants (11)
-
Arkady.Kanevsky＠dell.com
-
Ben Nemec
-
Clark Boylan
-
Edward Ionel
-
Ivan Kolodyazhny
-
Jeremy Stanley
-
Julia Kreger
-
Matt Riedemann
-
Rajini.Karthik＠Dell.com
-
Sean McGinnis
-
Tony Breeds