[Zuul] [neutron] Errors in the jobs definitions and EOL of some old networking-midonet branches
Hi, Today I got back to checking my old patches which are going to fix some zuul jobs' definitions. And I found that CI for networking-midonet in some stable branches is totally broken: * stable/ussuri: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/networking-midonet/+/823273[1] - everything is red here * stable/train: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/networking-midonet/+/823275[2] - most of the jobs are red * stable/stein: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/networking-midonet/+/823276[3] - here there were errors in the definition of the jobs, I changed it now, maybe it will run, So my question is if we want, and have resources, to fix it somehow or should we maybe set those branches as EOL now? Also, another question to the Zuul team - will it be ok if such branch will be EOL to get rid of the Zuul configuration errors warnings? Or should we somehow force to merge those patches first to get rid of the errors in https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/config-errors[4] ? -- Slawek Kaplonski Principal Software Engineer Red Hat -------- [1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/networking-midonet/+/823273 [2] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/networking-midonet/+/823275 [3] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/networking-midonet/+/823276 [4] https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/config-errors
On 2022-04-11 11:51:46 +0200 (+0200), Slawek Kaplonski wrote: [...]
will it be ok if such branch will be EOL to get rid of the Zuul configuration errors warnings? Or should we somehow force to merge those patches first to get rid of the errors [...]
Simply tagging the branch and removing it (standard EOL practice for the release managers) should suffice. There's no need to correct the configuration on branches if they're being deleted. -- Jeremy Stanley
Hi, On poniedziałek, 11 kwietnia 2022 14:18:12 CEST Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2022-04-11 11:51:46 +0200 (+0200), Slawek Kaplonski wrote: [...]
will it be ok if such branch will be EOL to get rid of the Zuul configuration errors warnings? Or should we somehow force to merge those patches first to get rid of the errors [...]
Simply tagging the branch and removing it (standard EOL practice for the release managers) should suffice. There's no need to correct the configuration on branches if they're being deleted.
Thanks for confirmation. That's what I thought but I wanted to be sure :)
-- Slawek Kaplonski Principal Software Engineer Red Hat
participants (2)
-
Jeremy Stanley
-
Slawek Kaplonski