[barbican][oslo][nova][glance][cinder] cursive library status
Hello Barbican team,
Apologies for not including barbican in the previous thread on this topic:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-December/019430....
The situation is that cursive is used by Nova, Glance, and Cinder and we'd like to move it out of the 'x' namespace into openstack governance. The question is then what team would oversee it. It seems like a good fit for Oslo, and the Oslo team seems OK with that, but since barbican-core is currently included in cursive-core, it make sense to give the Barbican team first dibs.
From the consuming teams' side, I don't think we have a preference as long as it's clear who we need to bother about approvals if a bugfix is posted for review.
Thus my ask is that the Barbican team indicate whether they'd like to move cursive to the 'openstack' namespace under their governance, or whether they'd prefer Oslo to oversee the library.
Thank you! brian
On 12/16/20 12:02 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
Hello Barbican team,
Apologies for not including barbican in the previous thread on this topic:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-December/019430....
The situation is that cursive is used by Nova, Glance, and Cinder and we'd like to move it out of the 'x' namespace into openstack governance. The question is then what team would oversee it. It seems like a good fit for Oslo, and the Oslo team seems OK with that, but since barbican-core is currently included in cursive-core, it make sense to give the Barbican team first dibs.
From the consuming teams' side, I don't think we have a preference as long as it's clear who we need to bother about approvals if a bugfix is posted for review.
Thus my ask is that the Barbican team indicate whether they'd like to move cursive to the 'openstack' namespace under their governance, or whether they'd prefer Oslo to oversee the library.
Note that this is not necessarily an either/or thing. Castellan is under Oslo governance but is co-owned by the Oslo and Barbican teams. We could do a similar thing with Cursive.
On 12/16/20 12:50 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 12/16/20 12:02 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
Hello Barbican team,
Apologies for not including barbican in the previous thread on this topic:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-December/019430....
The situation is that cursive is used by Nova, Glance, and Cinder and we'd like to move it out of the 'x' namespace into openstack governance. The question is then what team would oversee it. It seems like a good fit for Oslo, and the Oslo team seems OK with that, but since barbican-core is currently included in cursive-core, it make sense to give the Barbican team first dibs.
From the consuming teams' side, I don't think we have a preference as long as it's clear who we need to bother about approvals if a bugfix is posted for review.
Thus my ask is that the Barbican team indicate whether they'd like to move cursive to the 'openstack' namespace under their governance, or whether they'd prefer Oslo to oversee the library.
Note that this is not necessarily an either/or thing. Castellan is under Oslo governance but is co-owned by the Oslo and Barbican teams. We could do a similar thing with Cursive.
Hi Brian and Ben,
Sorry I missed the original thread. Given that the end of the year is around the corner, most of the Barbican team is out on PTO and we haven't had a chance to discuss this in our weekly meeting.
That said, I doubt anyone would object to moving cursive into the openstack namespace.
I personally do not mind the Oslo team taking over maintenace, and I am also willing to help review patches if the Oslo team would like to co-own this library just like we currently do for Castellan.
- Douglas Mendizábal (redrobot)
Hi Brian,
During Oslo's last weekly meeting [1] we decided that Oslo can take cursive under its umbrella with collaboration of Barbican folks. I just waited a bit with this confirmation as the Barbican PTL was on PTO and I wanted to confirm with him.
What are the next steps from here?
[1]: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/oslo/2021/oslo.2021-01-04-16.00.log....
Thanks, Moisés
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 10:06 PM Douglas Mendizabal dmendiza@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/16/20 12:50 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 12/16/20 12:02 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
Hello Barbican team,
Apologies for not including barbican in the previous thread on this topic:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-December/019430....
The situation is that cursive is used by Nova, Glance, and Cinder and we'd like to move it out of the 'x' namespace into openstack governance. The question is then what team would oversee it. It seems like a good fit for Oslo, and the Oslo team seems OK with that, but since barbican-core is currently included in cursive-core, it make sense to give the Barbican team first dibs.
From the consuming teams' side, I don't think we have a preference as long as it's clear who we need to bother about approvals if a bugfix is posted for review.
Thus my ask is that the Barbican team indicate whether they'd like to move cursive to the 'openstack' namespace under their governance, or whether they'd prefer Oslo to oversee the library.
Note that this is not necessarily an either/or thing. Castellan is under Oslo governance but is co-owned by the Oslo and Barbican teams. We could do a similar thing with Cursive.
Hi Brian and Ben,
Sorry I missed the original thread. Given that the end of the year is around the corner, most of the Barbican team is out on PTO and we haven't had a chance to discuss this in our weekly meeting.
That said, I doubt anyone would object to moving cursive into the openstack namespace.
I personally do not mind the Oslo team taking over maintenace, and I am also willing to help review patches if the Oslo team would like to co-own this library just like we currently do for Castellan.
- Douglas Mendizábal (redrobot)
On 1/11/21 10:57 AM, Moises Guimaraes de Medeiros wrote:
Hi Brian,
During Oslo's last weekly meeting [1] we decided that Oslo can take cursive under its umbrella with collaboration of Barbican folks. I just waited a bit with this confirmation as the Barbican PTL was on PTO and I wanted to confirm with him.
What are the next steps from here?
Thanks so much for following up! I think you need to do something like these patches from Ghanshyam to move devstack-plugin-nfs from x/ to openstack/ and bring it under QA governance:
https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/711834 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/711835
LMK if you want me to propose the patches, my intent is to get this issue solved, not to make more work for you!
cheers, brian
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/oslo/2021/oslo.2021-01-04-16.00.log.html#l-64
Thanks, Moisés
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 10:06 PM Douglas Mendizabal <dmendiza@redhat.com mailto:dmendiza@redhat.com> wrote:
On 12/16/20 12:50 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: > > > On 12/16/20 12:02 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: >> Hello Barbican team, >> >> Apologies for not including barbican in the previous thread on this >> topic: >> >> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-December/019430.html <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-December/019430.html> >> >> >> The situation is that cursive is used by Nova, Glance, and Cinder and >> we'd like to move it out of the 'x' namespace into openstack >> governance. The question is then what team would oversee it. It >> seems like a good fit for Oslo, and the Oslo team seems OK with that, >> but since barbican-core is currently included in cursive-core, it make >> sense to give the Barbican team first dibs. >> >> From the consuming teams' side, I don't think we have a preference as >> long as it's clear who we need to bother about approvals if a bugfix >> is posted for review. >> >> Thus my ask is that the Barbican team indicate whether they'd like to >> move cursive to the 'openstack' namespace under their governance, or >> whether they'd prefer Oslo to oversee the library. > > Note that this is not necessarily an either/or thing. Castellan is under > Oslo governance but is co-owned by the Oslo and Barbican teams. We could > do a similar thing with Cursive. > Hi Brian and Ben, Sorry I missed the original thread. Given that the end of the year is around the corner, most of the Barbican team is out on PTO and we haven't had a chance to discuss this in our weekly meeting. That said, I doubt anyone would object to moving cursive into the openstack namespace. I personally do not mind the Oslo team taking over maintenace, and I am also willing to help review patches if the Oslo team would like to co-own this library just like we currently do for Castellan. - Douglas Mendizábal (redrobot)--
Moisés Guimarães
Software Engineer
Red Hat https://www.redhat.com
Hello,
Do you've some updates to share with us about this topic?
Here is the process to follow if you rename a project to move out from “openstack” namespace to any other namespace and vice versa:
https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/repository.html#project-rename...
Please let us know if you have any questions or concerns
Le mer. 13 janv. 2021 à 14:44, Brian Rosmaita rosmaita.fossdev@gmail.com a écrit :
On 1/11/21 10:57 AM, Moises Guimaraes de Medeiros wrote:
Hi Brian,
During Oslo's last weekly meeting [1] we decided that Oslo can take cursive under its umbrella with collaboration of Barbican folks. I just waited a bit with this confirmation as the Barbican PTL was on PTO and I wanted to confirm with him.
What are the next steps from here?
Thanks so much for following up! I think you need to do something like these patches from Ghanshyam to move devstack-plugin-nfs from x/ to openstack/ and bring it under QA governance:
https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/711834 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/711835
LMK if you want me to propose the patches, my intent is to get this issue solved, not to make more work for you!
cheers, brian
[1]:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/oslo/2021/oslo.2021-01-04-16.00.log....
<
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/oslo/2021/oslo.2021-01-04-16.00.log....
Thanks, Moisés
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 10:06 PM Douglas Mendizabal <dmendiza@redhat.com mailto:dmendiza@redhat.com> wrote:
On 12/16/20 12:50 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: > > > On 12/16/20 12:02 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: >> Hello Barbican team, >> >> Apologies for not including barbican in the previous thread onthis
>> topic: >> >>http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-December/019430....
<http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-December/019430....
>> >> >> The situation is that cursive is used by Nova, Glance, and Cinder and >> we'd like to move it out of the 'x' namespace into openstack >> governance. The question is then what team would oversee it.It
>> seems like a good fit for Oslo, and the Oslo team seems OK with that, >> but since barbican-core is currently included in cursive-core, it make >> sense to give the Barbican team first dibs. >> >> From the consuming teams' side, I don't think we have a preference as >> long as it's clear who we need to bother about approvals if a bugfix >> is posted for review. >> >> Thus my ask is that the Barbican team indicate whether they'd like to >> move cursive to the 'openstack' namespace under their governance, or >> whether they'd prefer Oslo to oversee the library. > > Note that this is not necessarily an either/or thing. Castellan is under > Oslo governance but is co-owned by the Oslo and Barbican teams. We could > do a similar thing with Cursive. > Hi Brian and Ben, Sorry I missed the original thread. Given that the end of the yearis
around the corner, most of the Barbican team is out on PTO and we haven't had a chance to discuss this in our weekly meeting. That said, I doubt anyone would object to moving cursive into the openstack namespace. I personally do not mind the Oslo team taking over maintenace, and Iam
also willing to help review patches if the Oslo team would like to co-own this library just like we currently do for Castellan. - Douglas Mendizábal (redrobot)--
Moisés Guimarães
Software Engineer
Red Hat https://www.redhat.com
participants (5)
-
Ben Nemec
-
Brian Rosmaita
-
Douglas Mendizabal
-
Herve Beraud
-
Moises Guimaraes de Medeiros