Security Interface for Ironic Discussion
Hi all, I just wanted to throw out there a discussion we will be having about Ironic and the creation of a new generic security interface and integration with Keylime as a means of node attestation tomorrow at 1pm EST. I have attached a link to the spec we are drafting and a google calendar invite to this email. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic-specs/+/576718/20/specs/approv... https://calendar.google.com/event?action=TEMPLATE&tmeid=Nmx0azZqdTFxZ2QycjBwdHZycG9hZTdqZnYgbG1jZ2FubkByZWRoYXQuY29t&tmsrc=lmcgann%40redhat.com Thanks! Leo
On 2021-02-23 15:31:13 -0500 (-0500), Leo McGann wrote:
I just wanted to throw out there a discussion we will be having about Ironic and the creation of a new generic security interface and integration with Keylime as a means of node attestation tomorrow at 1pm EST. I have attached a link to the spec we are drafting and a google calendar invite to this email.
https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic-specs/+/576718/20/specs/approv...
Thanks for the heads up! Unfortunately, that URL doesn't seem to work unless you log into a Google account, from what I can tell. Can you follow up with the relevant details for the quarter of the world population whose government doesn't allow access to Google's services, but also people like me who use other, perhaps open source, calendaring solutions? -- Jeremy Stanley
On 2021-02-23 21:25:06 +0000 (+0000), Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2021-02-23 15:31:13 -0500 (-0500), Leo McGann wrote:
I just wanted to throw out there a discussion we will be having about Ironic and the creation of a new generic security interface and integration with Keylime as a means of node attestation tomorrow at 1pm EST. I have attached a link to the spec we are drafting and a google calendar invite to this email.
https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic-specs/+/576718/20/specs/approv...
Thanks for the heads up! Unfortunately, that URL doesn't seem to work unless you log into a Google account, from what I can tell. Can you follow up with the relevant details for the quarter of the world population whose government doesn't allow access to Google's services, but also people like me who use other, perhaps open source, calendaring solutions?
I still haven't seen anyone publish information to this mailing list on where/how the meeting is being held. At this point I have doubts that will happen in the next few minutes before it starts. Will there be a log, recording, or minutes published afterward at least, for those of us interested in the subject? -- Jeremy Stanley
The call is taking place at https://meet.google.com/vaf-jzoy-kqp. I'll try and keep notes and post them to the ironic whitbeboard etherpad. [1]: https://meet.google.com/vaf-jzoy-kqp [2]: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/IronicWhiteBoard On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 10:01 AM Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> wrote:
On 2021-02-23 21:25:06 +0000 (+0000), Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2021-02-23 15:31:13 -0500 (-0500), Leo McGann wrote:
I just wanted to throw out there a discussion we will be having about Ironic and the creation of a new generic security interface and integration with Keylime as a means of node attestation tomorrow at 1pm EST. I have attached a link to the spec we are drafting and a google calendar invite to this email.
https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic-specs/+/576718/20/specs/approv...
Thanks for the heads up! Unfortunately, that URL doesn't seem to work unless you log into a Google account, from what I can tell. Can you follow up with the relevant details for the quarter of the world population whose government doesn't allow access to Google's services, but also people like me who use other, perhaps open source, calendaring solutions?
I still haven't seen anyone publish information to this mailing list on where/how the meeting is being held. At this point I have doubts that will happen in the next few minutes before it starts. Will there be a log, recording, or minutes published afterward at least, for those of us interested in the subject? -- Jeremy Stanley
On 2021-02-24 10:06:40 -0800 (-0800), Julia Kreger wrote:
The call is taking place at https://meet.google.com/vaf-jzoy-kqp. I'll try and keep notes and post them to the ironic whitbeboard etherpad.
[1]: https://meet.google.com/vaf-jzoy-kqp [2]: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/IronicWhiteBoard [...]
Thanks! In that case I'll check out the pad and subsequent review comments on the spec. -- Jeremy Stanley
After talking with them, it looks like the spec will be revised since there was some confusion over the overall process mechanics. So hopefully the next revision has lessnetowrking assumptions baked in and a singular specific process flow will result. On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 10:36 AM Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> wrote:
On 2021-02-24 10:06:40 -0800 (-0800), Julia Kreger wrote:
The call is taking place at https://meet.google.com/vaf-jzoy-kqp. I'll try and keep notes and post them to the ironic whitbeboard etherpad.
[1]: https://meet.google.com/vaf-jzoy-kqp [2]: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/IronicWhiteBoard [...]
Thanks! In that case I'll check out the pad and subsequent review comments on the spec. -- Jeremy Stanley
participants (3)
-
Jeremy Stanley
-
Julia Kreger
-
Leo McGann