[nova][barbican][qa] barbican-tempest-plugin change breaking bfv [ceph]
Hi everyone, We just had our gating break due to a change merging inside barbican-tempest-plugin which is the following: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/515210/ It is resulting in an exception in our CI: 2020-08-26 18:04:32.663188 | controller | Response - Headers: {'content-length': '257', 'content-type': 'application/json', 'x-openstack-request-id': 'req-7f55e463-c3de-445e-a814-ef79c5f21235', 'connection': 'close', 'status': '409', 'content-location': 'http://glance.openstack.svc.cluster.local/v2/images/dec14e17-0870-415f-82a6-140c1b7e4a39'} 2020-08-26 18:04:32.663200 | controller | Body: b'{"message": "Image dec14e17-0870-415f-82a6-140c1b7e4a39 could not be deleted because it is in use: The image cannot be deleted because it is in use through the backend store outside of Glance.<br /><br />\\n\\n\\n", "code": "409 Conflict", "title": "Conflict"}' This is usually because it's trying to delete the Glance image before deleting an instance that is using it, the specific test that is failing is: barbican_tempest_plugin.tests.scenario.test_certificate_validation.CertificateValidationTest.test_signed_image_invalid_cert_boot_failure[compute,id-6d354881-35a6-4568-94b8-2204bbf67b29,image] This test landed yesterday, we're blacklisting the scenario right now. I do find it quite interesting that in the logs here: http://paste.openstack.org/show/797186/ That the instance reports that it _does_ indeed delete it, so maybe we are trying to delete the image afterwards _too quickly_ and need to wait for Nova to clean up? I'd love to enable that test again and continue full coverage, happy to hear discussion. Thanks Mohammed -- Mohammed Naser VEXXHOST, Inc.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 8/26/20 2:44 PM, Mohammed Naser wrote:
Hi everyone,
We just had our gating break due to a change merging inside barbican-tempest-plugin which is the following:
https://review.opendev.org/#/c/515210/
It is resulting in an exception in our CI: [snip]
Hi Mohammed, Unfortunately I still haven't had a chance to chase down this CI failure. I did open a new Bug story for barbican-tempest-plugin so this issue doesn't get lost in the mailing list: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2008146 Thanks, Douglas Mendizábal -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEwcapj5oGTj2zd3XogB6WFOq/OrcFAl9gt6QACgkQgB6WFOq/ OrfjOhAAhw3DGKvBdRA4Lei0zhTIM4bdeR/7kcqokNNv/iyGCBo9vmnx0NuUwmkO gvx3S+G9amscyuND9stmEqRDw8BC9mxPutS99G7VPJ/VIFpEqeAiEYELFfIBLKfO QzEJOjYzwDgoW5FODDffnhXPuAXXnPPzPpCA2Ey7d4DXo5X4kL8lkXIwEEibrrz4 o1843h36pxVKjvWCsEra1rKX9txvzDZSxT9XJbU44J5Umi8MHPi2rQE0qNeoUNac XfZE0cpsBsM+FUW0w2fD8L7GJKgF02N5wwXaglnbg/XgEPwfg8Cg0gcCD7q6xPgn yWNKHJkJVdlpXFM1Yqa+TKlMSUaw/4iAWR52WmKbJ09ro2HnGxiOWaU2OJFIea/g raDIj31qhhaEue9qf71dheRmwHUWcw3SF6wfyFkQgEWm1vW6F23/m4Cv9f3uKjJ1 zXD839vf7UtA28N3KfrkOcMEV05/QmMSxNuSPYqgFVLYW+oGt5xWjI9eKhhS4d5g AWFxEvUB2atuljGeFJKq8iIgeNiQzRgg5mb6hB8/YrFRTDWB8JpSJsftitIDvkUe hrUntGvP2WMzfooDJhgYtR5Fnbl0Fhg5SGM3ZkHvBZnhyX+IIvlLYjnAmcCqZ3Pb UEYXzB8F9dTJ0Ekp0w4VoWBUBpjBCtjRhccHBrngvp8htRxt6ug= =SOQs -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (2)
-
Douglas Mendizabal
-
Mohammed Naser