[ironic] RFC: In-Person-only PTG in Vancouver
Hey all, It was brought to my attention that there will not be much opportunity for remote participation in the PTG. We would have to manage the A/V ourselves in a shared room which would likely be extremely disruptive and ineffective. So I'm left with a few questions: should we continue forward with a PTG session for Ironic in Vancouver? What topics would be suitable with only a limited number of core reviewers available? I propose that the Ironic team uses the PTG venue for an informal collaboration and hacking space. It doesn't seem right for us to make any in-depth plans with only a subset of the core team. What do you all think? -- Jay Faulkner Ironic PTL TC Vice-Chair
Hey Jay, One other option we could provide is a dedicated room for the discussions you need others to be involved in that are not physically present. There should be two of them available. -Kendall On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 9:32 AM Jay Faulkner <jay@gr-oss.io> wrote:
Hey all,
It was brought to my attention that there will not be much opportunity for remote participation in the PTG. We would have to manage the A/V ourselves in a shared room which would likely be extremely disruptive and ineffective.
So I'm left with a few questions: should we continue forward with a PTG session for Ironic in Vancouver? What topics would be suitable with only a limited number of core reviewers available?
I propose that the Ironic team uses the PTG venue for an informal collaboration and hacking space. It doesn't seem right for us to make any in-depth plans with only a subset of the core team.
What do you all think?
-- Jay Faulkner Ironic PTL TC Vice-Chair
Oh, that would help us a lot as well, since some highly valuable core contributors to OpenStack-Ansible won't be present in Vancouver despite good half of active contributors will be on site. Though I see how we all might start fighting for these rooms :D ср, 17 мая 2023 г., 17:03 Kendall Nelson <kennelson11@gmail.com>:
Hey Jay,
One other option we could provide is a dedicated room for the discussions you need others to be involved in that are not physically present. There should be two of them available.
-Kendall
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 9:32 AM Jay Faulkner <jay@gr-oss.io> wrote:
Hey all,
It was brought to my attention that there will not be much opportunity for remote participation in the PTG. We would have to manage the A/V ourselves in a shared room which would likely be extremely disruptive and ineffective.
So I'm left with a few questions: should we continue forward with a PTG session for Ironic in Vancouver? What topics would be suitable with only a limited number of core reviewers available?
I propose that the Ironic team uses the PTG venue for an informal collaboration and hacking space. It doesn't seem right for us to make any in-depth plans with only a subset of the core team.
What do you all think?
-- Jay Faulkner Ironic PTL TC Vice-Chair
If we can determine a list of items and time blocks to move to that room, then I suspect we could all make it work. With the virtual ptgs over the last few years with contributors all over the world, we have surely gotten better at time boxing high bandwidth discussions. I hope. ;) -Julia On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 8:17 AM Dmitriy Rabotyagov <noonedeadpunk@gmail.com> wrote:
Oh, that would help us a lot as well, since some highly valuable core contributors to OpenStack-Ansible won't be present in Vancouver despite good half of active contributors will be on site.
Though I see how we all might start fighting for these rooms :D
ср, 17 мая 2023 г., 17:03 Kendall Nelson <kennelson11@gmail.com>:
Hey Jay,
One other option we could provide is a dedicated room for the discussions you need others to be involved in that are not physically present. There should be two of them available.
-Kendall
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 9:32 AM Jay Faulkner <jay@gr-oss.io> wrote:
Hey all,
It was brought to my attention that there will not be much opportunity for remote participation in the PTG. We would have to manage the A/V ourselves in a shared room which would likely be extremely disruptive and ineffective.
So I'm left with a few questions: should we continue forward with a PTG session for Ironic in Vancouver? What topics would be suitable with only a limited number of core reviewers available?
I propose that the Ironic team uses the PTG venue for an informal collaboration and hacking space. It doesn't seem right for us to make any in-depth plans with only a subset of the core team.
What do you all think?
-- Jay Faulkner Ironic PTL TC Vice-Chair
participants (4)
-
Dmitriy Rabotyagov
-
Jay Faulkner
-
Julia Kreger
-
Kendall Nelson