[tc][all] Community-wide goal Ussuri and V cycle forum collaboration idea
Hello Everyone, During the TC meeting on 10th Oct, we discussed the community-wide goal planning for Ussuri as well as the V cycle[1] but there was no consensus on V cycle planning so I am bringing this to ML for further thoughts. Ussuri cycle goal planning is all good here, That has been already started[2] and we have a dedicated forum session [3] for the same to discuss the goals in more detail. Question is for V cycle goal planning, whether we should discuss the V cycle goal in Ussuri goal fourm sessoin[3] or it is too early to kick off V cycle goal at least until we finalize U cycle goal first. I would like to list the below two options to proceed further (at least to decide if we need to change the existing U cycle goal forum sessions title). 1. Merge the Forum session for both cycle goal discussion (divide both in two half). This need forum session title and description change. 2. Keep forum session for U cycle goal only and start the V cycle over ML asynchronously. This will help to avoid any confusion or mixing the both cycle goal discussions. Thoughts? [1] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2019/tc.2019-10-10-14.00.log.html... [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PVG-u-series-goals [3] https://www.openstack.org/summit/shanghai-2019/summit-schedule/events/24398/... -gmann
On 10/14/2019 5:52 PM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote:
Question is for V cycle goal planning, whether we should discuss the V cycle goal in Ussuri goal fourm sessoin[3] or it is too early to kick off V cycle goal at least until we finalize U cycle goal first. I would like to list the below two options to proceed further (at least to decide if we need to change the existing U cycle goal forum sessions title).
1. Merge the Forum session for both cycle goal discussion (divide both in two half). This need forum session title and description change. 2. Keep forum session for U cycle goal only and start the V cycle over ML asynchronously. This will help to avoid any confusion or mixing the both cycle goal discussions.
So you have 40 minutes to discuss something that is notoriously hard to sort out for one release let alone the future, and to date there are only 3 goals proposed for Ussuri. Why even consider goals for V at this point when settling on goals for Train was kind of a (train)wreck (get it?!) and goal champions for Ussuri aren't necessarily champing at the bit? I won't be there so I don't have a horse in this race (yay more idioms), just commenting from the peanut gallery. -- Thanks, Matt
---- On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 10:24:58 -0500 Matt Riedemann <mriedemos@gmail.com> wrote ----
On 10/14/2019 5:52 PM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote:
Question is for V cycle goal planning, whether we should discuss the V cycle goal in Ussuri goal fourm sessoin[3] or it is too early to kick off V cycle goal at least until we finalize U cycle goal first. I would like to list the below two options to proceed further (at least to decide if we need to change the existing U cycle goal forum sessions title).
1. Merge the Forum session for both cycle goal discussion (divide both in two half). This need forum session title and description change. 2. Keep forum session for U cycle goal only and start the V cycle over ML asynchronously. This will help to avoid any confusion or mixing the both cycle goal discussions.
So you have 40 minutes to discuss something that is notoriously hard to sort out for one release let alone the future, and to date there are only 3 goals proposed for Ussuri. Why even consider goals for V at this point when settling on goals for Train was kind of a (train)wreck (get it?!) and goal champions for Ussuri aren't necessarily champing at the bit?
I won't be there so I don't have a horse in this race (yay more idioms), just commenting from the peanut gallery.
Agree with you and let's keep the Forum session for Ussuri cycle goal discussions and we can start V cycle one on ML later. -gmann
--
Thanks,
Matt
participants (2)
-
Ghanshyam Mann
-
Matt Riedemann