To whom it may concern, I am helping a colleague of mine with the following pieces of work: 820027 (https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/820027 <https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/820027>), 820030 (https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder-specs/+/820030 <https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder-specs/+/820030>). I was wondering whether it is not too late to include the aforementioned within the Zed release? Is there anyone who can advise on this matter? Best Regards, Sergey
On 05/07, Sergey Drozdov wrote:
To whom it may concern,
I am helping a colleague of mine with the following pieces of work: 820027 (https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/820027 <https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/820027>), 820030 (https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder-specs/+/820030 <https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder-specs/+/820030>). I was wondering whether it is not too late to include the aforementioned within the Zed release? Is there anyone who can advise on this matter?
Best Regards, Sergey
Hi Sergey, Cinder is in spec freeze, and the spec freeze exception request period ended last Friday, though I personally don't see much problem in merging this particular spec later, since I don't even think a spec is really necessary here since it's just implementing a standard feature, but that's just my opinion. I have reviewed both spec and patch and added some comments. Cheers, Gorka.
Hi Sergey, As Gorka said, we generally don't require spec for driver features but we encourage to register a blueprint on launchpad[1] so as to keep track of all the features. Having said that, the spec would act as a good point of documentation so we can consider it merging. It's a good point for discussion which i will add it in the cinder meeting agenda today[2] but even if it doesn't merge this cycle (since we're already in the spec freeze exception phase), we can do it next cycle without blocking reviews of the main feature. [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder [2] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-zed-meetings Thanks and regards Rajat Dhasmana On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 2:19 PM Sergey Drozdov <sergey.drozdov.dev@gmail.com> wrote:
To whom it may concern,
I am helping a colleague of mine with the following pieces of work: 820027 (https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/820027), 820030 ( https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder-specs/+/820030). I was wondering whether it is not too late to include the aforementioned within the Zed release? Is there anyone who can advise on this matter?
Best Regards, Sergey
participants (3)
-
Gorka Eguileor
-
Rajat Dhasmana
-
Sergey Drozdov