[sdk] Request to release newer version of openstacksdk for Stein Cycle
Hi SDK team, I have requested a release of openstacksdk which includes changes to the instance-ha service to get the recovery workflow details of the notification. Kindly consider our request on behalf of Masakari team to release a newer version of openstacksdk so that we can use this newer version in masakari-dashboard [1] to render the recovery workflow details on the notification screen. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. [1] : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/640755/ Regards, Tushar Patil Disclaimer: This email and any attachments are sent in strictest confidence for the sole use of the addressee and may contain legally privileged, confidential, and proprietary data. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise the sender by replying promptly to this email and then delete and destroy this email and any attachments without any further use, copying or forwarding.
"Patil, Tushar" <Tushar.Patil@nttdata.com> writes:
Hi SDK team,
I have requested a release of openstacksdk which includes changes to the instance-ha service to get the recovery workflow details of the notification.
Kindly consider our request on behalf of Masakari team to release a newer version of openstacksdk so that we can use this newer version in masakari-dashboard [1] to render the recovery workflow details on the notification screen.
Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
[1] : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/640755/
Regards, Tushar Patil Disclaimer: This email and any attachments are sent in strictest confidence for the sole use of the addressee and may contain legally privileged, confidential, and proprietary data. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise the sender by replying promptly to this email and then delete and destroy this email and any attachments without any further use, copying or forwarding.
We are past the freeze dates for libraries, so we will need a feature freeze exception in order to update the required version of the library used in CI. I have tagged this thread with [release] and [requirements] to alert the teams that need to give that permission. -- Doug
On 19-03-10 11:31:39, Doug Hellmann wrote:
"Patil, Tushar" <Tushar.Patil@nttdata.com> writes:
Hi SDK team,
I have requested a release of openstacksdk which includes changes to the instance-ha service to get the recovery workflow details of the notification.
Kindly consider our request on behalf of Masakari team to release a newer version of openstacksdk so that we can use this newer version in masakari-dashboard [1] to render the recovery workflow details on the notification screen.
Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
[1] : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/640755/
Regards, Tushar Patil Disclaimer: This email and any attachments are sent in strictest confidence for the sole use of the addressee and may contain legally privileged, confidential, and proprietary data. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise the sender by replying promptly to this email and then delete and destroy this email and any attachments without any further use, copying or forwarding.
We are past the freeze dates for libraries, so we will need a feature freeze exception in order to update the required version of the library used in CI. I have tagged this thread with [release] and [requirements] to alert the teams that need to give that permission.
This sounds like a upper-constraints.txt change for requirements and a requirements.txt change for masakari-dashboard. Are there any other projects that would need to use the new version as well (and therefor also require new releases)? https://github.com/openstack/openstacksdk/compare/0.25.0...1066c9385fec669a2... looks ok as far as the changeset goes. -- Matthew Thode
On 3/10/19 5:42 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
On 19-03-10 11:31:39, Doug Hellmann wrote:
"Patil, Tushar" <Tushar.Patil@nttdata.com> writes:
Hi SDK team,
I have requested a release of openstacksdk which includes changes to the instance-ha service to get the recovery workflow details of the notification.
Kindly consider our request on behalf of Masakari team to release a newer version of openstacksdk so that we can use this newer version in masakari-dashboard [1] to render the recovery workflow details on the notification screen.
Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
[1] : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/640755/
Regards, Tushar Patil Disclaimer: This email and any attachments are sent in strictest confidence for the sole use of the addressee and may contain legally privileged, confidential, and proprietary data. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise the sender by replying promptly to this email and then delete and destroy this email and any attachments without any further use, copying or forwarding.
We are past the freeze dates for libraries, so we will need a feature freeze exception in order to update the required version of the library used in CI. I have tagged this thread with [release] and [requirements] to alert the teams that need to give that permission.
This sounds like a upper-constraints.txt change for requirements and a requirements.txt change for masakari-dashboard. Are there any other projects that would need to use the new version as well (and therefor also require new releases)?
https://github.com/openstack/openstacksdk/compare/0.25.0...1066c9385fec669a2... looks ok as far as the changeset goes.
Hold up - I think we need to do something before this moves forward (although I'm certainly fine with releasing the fix needed by masakari - and sorry we missed that patch before release - I think I missed that it was release critical) There is a patch that landed just before the masakari patch that I *NOT* think we should slam in to a point release - as it's a big change. (it's a good one - I just don't want to do that at the last minute) That is patch c9b60f2b8634c7f8c4254e158cc921202538db04 So what I propose we do is revert c9b60f2b8634c7f8c4254e158cc921202538db04 - [0] - then cut an 0.26.0 for masakari with the resulting state for stein, then we can re-revert the TaskManager patch [1] as essentially the first thing for train. Sound ok? [0] https://review.openstack.org/642298 Revert "Replace TaskManager with a keystoneauth concurrency" [1] https://review.openstack.org/642299 Revert "Revert "Replace TaskManager with a keystoneauth concurrency""
On 19-03-10 22:18:11, Monty Taylor wrote:
On 3/10/19 5:42 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
On 19-03-10 11:31:39, Doug Hellmann wrote:
"Patil, Tushar" <Tushar.Patil@nttdata.com> writes:
Hi SDK team,
I have requested a release of openstacksdk which includes changes to the instance-ha service to get the recovery workflow details of the notification.
Kindly consider our request on behalf of Masakari team to release a newer version of openstacksdk so that we can use this newer version in masakari-dashboard [1] to render the recovery workflow details on the notification screen.
Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
[1] : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/640755/
Regards, Tushar Patil Disclaimer: This email and any attachments are sent in strictest confidence for the sole use of the addressee and may contain legally privileged, confidential, and proprietary data. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise the sender by replying promptly to this email and then delete and destroy this email and any attachments without any further use, copying or forwarding.
We are past the freeze dates for libraries, so we will need a feature freeze exception in order to update the required version of the library used in CI. I have tagged this thread with [release] and [requirements] to alert the teams that need to give that permission.
This sounds like a upper-constraints.txt change for requirements and a requirements.txt change for masakari-dashboard. Are there any other projects that would need to use the new version as well (and therefor also require new releases)?
https://github.com/openstack/openstacksdk/compare/0.25.0...1066c9385fec669a2... looks ok as far as the changeset goes.
Hold up - I think we need to do something before this moves forward (although I'm certainly fine with releasing the fix needed by masakari - and sorry we missed that patch before release - I think I missed that it was release critical)
There is a patch that landed just before the masakari patch that I *NOT* think we should slam in to a point release - as it's a big change. (it's a good one - I just don't want to do that at the last minute) That is patch c9b60f2b8634c7f8c4254e158cc921202538db04
So what I propose we do is revert c9b60f2b8634c7f8c4254e158cc921202538db04 - [0] - then cut an 0.26.0 for masakari with the resulting state for stein, then we can re-revert the TaskManager patch [1] as essentially the first thing for train.
Sound ok?
[0] https://review.openstack.org/642298 Revert "Replace TaskManager with a keystoneauth concurrency" [1] https://review.openstack.org/642299 Revert "Revert "Replace TaskManager with a keystoneauth concurrency""
Sounds good to me, that was the main patch I was worried about. -- Matthew Thode
Sound ok?
[0] https://review.openstack.org/642298 Revert "Replace TaskManager with a keystoneauth concurrency" [1] https://review.openstack.org/642299 Revert "Revert "Replace TaskManager with a keystoneauth concurrency""
Sounds good to me, that was the main patch I was worried about.
Thank you for accommodating our request at the last minute to release 0.26.0 version of openstacksdk. Looking forward to get these patches merge soon. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/642298 - Revert "Replace TaskManager with a keystoneauth concurrency" https://review.openstack.org/#/c/642251 - Release of 0.26.0 of openstacksdk, Note: Once above patch is merged, I will update hash in my patch accordingly. Thank you for your cooperation. Regards, Tushar Patil ________________________________________ From: Matthew Thode <mthode@mthode.org> Sent: Monday, March 11, 2019 7:26:51 AM To: openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [sdk][release][requirements] Request to release newer version of openstacksdk for Stein Cycle On 19-03-10 22:18:11, Monty Taylor wrote:
On 3/10/19 5:42 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
On 19-03-10 11:31:39, Doug Hellmann wrote:
"Patil, Tushar" <Tushar.Patil@nttdata.com> writes:
Hi SDK team,
I have requested a release of openstacksdk which includes changes to the instance-ha service to get the recovery workflow details of the notification.
Kindly consider our request on behalf of Masakari team to release a newer version of openstacksdk so that we can use this newer version in masakari-dashboard [1] to render the recovery workflow details on the notification screen.
Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
[1] : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/640755/
Regards, Tushar Patil Disclaimer: This email and any attachments are sent in strictest confidence for the sole use of the addressee and may contain legally privileged, confidential, and proprietary data. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise the sender by replying promptly to this email and then delete and destroy this email and any attachments without any further use, copying or forwarding.
We are past the freeze dates for libraries, so we will need a feature freeze exception in order to update the required version of the library used in CI. I have tagged this thread with [release] and [requirements] to alert the teams that need to give that permission.
This sounds like a upper-constraints.txt change for requirements and a requirements.txt change for masakari-dashboard. Are there any other projects that would need to use the new version as well (and therefor also require new releases)?
https://github.com/openstack/openstacksdk/compare/0.25.0...1066c9385fec669a2... looks ok as far as the changeset goes.
Hold up - I think we need to do something before this moves forward (although I'm certainly fine with releasing the fix needed by masakari - and sorry we missed that patch before release - I think I missed that it was release critical)
There is a patch that landed just before the masakari patch that I *NOT* think we should slam in to a point release - as it's a big change. (it's a good one - I just don't want to do that at the last minute) That is patch c9b60f2b8634c7f8c4254e158cc921202538db04
So what I propose we do is revert c9b60f2b8634c7f8c4254e158cc921202538db04 - [0] - then cut an 0.26.0 for masakari with the resulting state for stein, then we can re-revert the TaskManager patch [1] as essentially the first thing for train.
Sound ok?
[0] https://review.openstack.org/642298 Revert "Replace TaskManager with a keystoneauth concurrency" [1] https://review.openstack.org/642299 Revert "Revert "Replace TaskManager with a keystoneauth concurrency""
Sounds good to me, that was the main patch I was worried about. -- Matthew Thode Disclaimer: This email and any attachments are sent in strictest confidence for the sole use of the addressee and may contain legally privileged, confidential, and proprietary data. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise the sender by replying promptly to this email and then delete and destroy this email and any attachments without any further use, copying or forwarding.
participants (4)
-
Doug Hellmann
-
Matthew Thode
-
Monty Taylor
-
Patil, Tushar