[placement][ptg] Open Questions
A few questions we failed to resolve during the PTG that we should work out over the next couple of weeks. * There are two specs in progress related to more flexible ways to filter traits: * any trait in allocation candidates https://review.opendev.org/#/c/649992/ * support mixing required traits with any traits https://review.opendev.org/#/c/649368/ Do we have pending non-placement features which depend on the above being completed? I got the impression during the nova-placement xproj session that maybe they were, but it's not clear. Anyone willing to state one way or another? * We had several RFE stories already in progress, and have added a few more during the PTG. We have not done much in the way of prioritizing these. We certainly can't do them all. Here's a link to the current RFE stories in the placement group (this includes placement, osc-placement and os-*). https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/worklist/594 I've made a simple list of those on an etherpad, please register you +1 or -1 (or nothing) on each of those. Keep in mind that there are several features in "Update nested provider support to address train requirements" and that we've already committed to them. Please let me know what I've forgotten. -- Chris Dent ٩◔̯◔۶ https://anticdent.org/ freenode: cdent tw: @anticdent
On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 3:23 AM, Chris Dent <cdent+os@anticdent.org> wrote:
A few questions we failed to resolve during the PTG that we should work out over the next couple of weeks.
* There are two specs in progress related to more flexible ways to filter traits:
* any trait in allocation candidates
* support mixing required traits with any traits
Do we have pending non-placement features which depend on the above being completed? I got the impression during the nova-placement xproj session that maybe they were, but it's not clear. Anyone willing to state one way or another?
From the first spec: "This is required for the case when a Neutron network maps to more than one physnets but the port's bandwidth request can be fulfilled from any physnet the port's network maps to." So yes there is a use case that can only be supported if placement supports any traits in a_c query. It is to support multisegment neutron networks with QoS minimum bandwidth rule and with more than one segment mapped to physnet. A reason we did not discussed it in detail is that the use case was downprioritized on my side. (see https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ptg-train-xproj-nova-neutron L40)
* We had several RFE stories already in progress, and have added a few more during the PTG. We have not done much in the way of prioritizing these. We certainly can't do them all. Here's a link to the current RFE stories in the placement group (this includes placement, osc-placement and os-*).
https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/worklist/594
I've made a simple list of those on an etherpad, please register you +1 or -1 (or nothing) on each of those. Keep in mind that there are several features in "Update nested provider support to address train requirements" and that we've already committed to them.
Did you forget to paste the etherpad link?
Please let me know what I've forgotten.
-- Chris Dent ٩◔̯◔۶ https://protect2.fireeye.com/url?k=2e065f7d-728c7d97-2e061fe6-0cc47ad93e32-0c1780ffb89507f5&u=https://anticdent.org/ freenode: cdent tw: @anticdent
On Mon, 6 May 2019, Balázs Gibizer wrote:
* We had several RFE stories already in progress, and have added a few more during the PTG. We have not done much in the way of prioritizing these. We certainly can't do them all. Here's a link to the current RFE stories in the placement group (this includes placement, osc-placement and os-*).
https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/worklist/594
I've made a simple list of those on an etherpad, please register you +1 or -1 (or nothing) on each of those. Keep in mind that there are several features in "Update nested provider support to address train requirements" and that we've already committed to them.
Did you forget to paste the etherpad link?
Whoops, sorry about that. Clearly there have been some long days: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/placement-ptg-train-rfe-voter Thanks for noticing. -- Chris Dent ٩◔̯◔۶ https://anticdent.org/ freenode: cdent tw: @anticdent
participants (2)
-
Balázs Gibizer
-
Chris Dent