[ironic] Thoughts on closing some branches
Hello Ironicers o/ I would like to gather some feedback before moving forward with the oficial request to close some branches. 1) Closing some bugfix branches I would like to check if we are ok with closing all other bugfix branches except for: *ironic:* bugfix/20.2 | bugfix/19.0 | bugfix/18.1 *ironic-python-agent:* bugfix/8.6 | bugfix/8.3 | bugfix/8.1 *ironic-inspector:* bugfix/10.12 | bugfix/10.9 | bugfix/10.7 These are the branches I know people use, but it's good to double check before removing all other bugfix/*. The reason to close is because it became a bit more complicated to maintain CI working properly in those branches, so if we don't have people using and looking at backports and making CI work I think we can close them. 2) Closing all stable branches pre-train. Thanks! -- *Att[]'s* *Iury Gregory Melo Ferreira * *MSc in Computer Science at UFCG* *Ironic PTL * *Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat Brazil* *Social*: https://www.linkedin.com/in/iurygregory *E-mail: iurygregory@gmail.com <iurygregory@gmail.com>*
All good for both points, thanks Iury! Ciao, Riccardo On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 3:19 PM Iury Gregory <iurygregory@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Ironicers o/
I would like to gather some feedback before moving forward with the oficial request to close some branches.
1) Closing some bugfix branches I would like to check if we are ok with closing all other bugfix branches except for: *ironic:* bugfix/20.2 | bugfix/19.0 | bugfix/18.1 *ironic-python-agent:* bugfix/8.6 | bugfix/8.3 | bugfix/8.1 *ironic-inspector:* bugfix/10.12 | bugfix/10.9 | bugfix/10.7 These are the branches I know people use, but it's good to double check before removing all other bugfix/*.
The reason to close is because it became a bit more complicated to maintain CI working properly in those branches, so if we don't have people using and looking at backports and making CI work I think we can close them.
2) Closing all stable branches pre-train.
Thanks!
-- *Att[]'s*
*Iury Gregory Melo Ferreira * *MSc in Computer Science at UFCG* *Ironic PTL * *Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat Brazil* *Social*: https://www.linkedin.com/in/iurygregory *E-mail: iurygregory@gmail.com <iurygregory@gmail.com>*
Sounds good to me as well. Thanks, Iury!
On 06/28/2022 10:27 AM Riccardo Pittau <elfosardo@gmail.com> wrote:
All good for both points, thanks Iury!
Ciao, Riccardo
On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 3:19 PM Iury Gregory <iurygregory@gmail.com <mailto:iurygregory@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello Ironicers o/
I would like to gather some feedback before moving forward with the oficial request to close some branches.
1) Closing some bugfix branches I would like to check if we are ok with closing all other bugfix branches except for: ironic: bugfix/20.2 | bugfix/19.0 | bugfix/18.1 ironic-python-agent: bugfix/8.6 | bugfix/8.3 | bugfix/8.1
ironic-inspector: bugfix/10.12 | bugfix/10.9 | bugfix/10.7
These are the branches I know people use, but it's good to double check before removing all other bugfix/*.
The reason to close is because it became a bit more complicated to maintain CI working properly in those branches, so if we don't have people using and looking at backports and making CI work I think we can close them.
2) Closing all stable branches pre-train.
Thanks!
--
Att[]'s Iury Gregory Melo Ferreira MSc in Computer Science at UFCG
Ironic PTL Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat Brazil Social: https://www.linkedin.com/in/iurygregory <https://www.linkedin.com/in/iurygregory> E-mail: iurygregory@gmail.com <mailto:iurygregory@gmail.com> >
participants (3)
-
Arne.Wiebalck＠cern.ch
-
Iury Gregory
-
Riccardo Pittau