Nate,

Thanks for all your contributions and hard work. Thanks especially for your story!

Thanks,

Amy (spotz)

On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 10:32 AM Nate Johnston nate.johnston@redhat.com wrote:

All,

I have decided not to run for reelection to the TC. Although I remain a part of the OpenStack community my responsibilities have shifted away from engineering, and I strongly believe that the TC should be composed of people who are actively creating or operating OpenStack on a daily basis. I am deeply appreciative for all of the support I have recieved from current and former TC members.

I also want to take this chance to tell my story a bit, in hopes that it will encourage others to participate more with the TC. A year ago when I joined the TC I did not have a clear idea what to expect. I had observed a few TC meetings and brought one issue to the TC's attention, but since I did not have background on the workstreams in progress, there was a lot that I did not understand or could not contextualize. So what I did was observe, gathering an understanding of the issues and initiatives and raising my hand to participate when I felt like my efforts could make a difference. I was pleasantly surprised how many times I was able to raise my hand and work on things like community goals or proposals like distributed project leadership. The fact that I have not been around since the beginning - my first significant code contributions were merged in the Mitaka cycle - and I did not already know all the names and histories did not matter much. What mattered was a willingness to actively engage, to participate in thoughtful discernment, and when the opportunity presented itself to put in the work. I feel like I made a difference.

And if you don't feel the calling to join the TC, that is fine too. Be a part of the process - join the meetings, discuss the issues that cut across projects, and have your voice heard. If you are a part of creting or using OpenStack then you are a part of the TC's constituency and the meetings are to serve you. You don't have to be a member of the TC to participate in the process.

Thanks so much,

Nate Johnston

---- On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 10:29:33 -0500 Nate Johnston nate.johnston@redhat.com wrote ----

All,

I have decided not to run for reelection to the TC. Although I remain a part of the OpenStack community my responsibilities have shifted away from engineering, and I strongly believe that the TC should be composed of people who are actively creating or operating OpenStack on a daily basis. I am deeply appreciative for all of the support I have recieved from current and former TC members.

I also want to take this chance to tell my story a bit, in hopes that it will encourage others to participate more with the TC. A year ago when I joined the TC I did not have a clear idea what to expect. I had observed a few TC meetings and brought one issue to the TC's attention, but since I did not have background on the workstreams in progress, there was a lot that I did not understand or could not contextualize. So what I did was observe, gathering an understanding of the issues and initiatives and raising my hand to participate when I felt like my efforts could make a difference. I was pleasantly surprised how many times I was able to raise my hand and work on things like community goals or proposals like distributed project leadership. The fact that I have not been around since the beginning - my first significant code contributions were merged in the Mitaka cycle - and I did not already know all the names and histories did not matter much. What mattered was a willingness to actively engage, to participate in thoughtful discernment, and when the opportunity presented itself to put in the work. I feel like I made a difference.

And if you don't feel the calling to join the TC, that is fine too. Be a part of the process - join the meetings, discuss the issues that cut across projects, and have your voice heard. If you are a part of creting or using OpenStack then you are a part of the TC's constituency and the meetings are to serve you. You don't have to be a member of the TC to participate in the process.

Thanks Nate for your contribution in TC, I really enjoyed working with you especially on goal selections.

-gmann

Thanks so much,

Nate Johnston

On 18/09/20 11:29 am, Nate Johnston wrote:

I also want to take this chance to tell my story a bit, in hopes that it will encourage others to participate more with the TC. A year ago when I joined the TC I did not have a clear idea what to expect. I had observed a few TC meetings and brought one issue to the TC's attention, but since I did not have background on the workstreams in progress, there was a lot that I did not understand or could not contextualize. So what I did was observe, gathering an understanding of the issues and initiatives and raising my hand to participate when I felt like my efforts could make a difference. I was pleasantly surprised how many times I was able to raise my hand and work on things like community goals or proposals like distributed project leadership. The fact that I have not been around since the beginning - my first significant code contributions were merged in the Mitaka cycle - and I did not already know all the names and histories did not matter much. What mattered was a willingness to actively engage, to participate in thoughtful discernment, and when the opportunity presented itself to put in the work. I feel like I made a difference.

And if you don't feel the calling to join the TC, that is fine too. Be a part of the process - join the meetings, discuss the issues that cut across projects, and have your voice heard. If you are a part of creting or using OpenStack then you are a part of the TC's constituency and the meetings are to serve you. You don't have to be a member of the TC to participate in the process.

Great advice! Thanks Nate for stepping up and helping.

cheers, Zane.