[Containers SIG][tc]Is any one interested on Containers SIG? Or should we retire Containers SIG?
Dear all, I just propose a patch to openstack/governance-sigs to officially retire containers SIG [1]. In past months, there's no activity in the SIG, and Jean-Philippe didn't get time for the SIG chair role too. IMO, The goal from Containers SIG definitely provide great value to Openstack community because we didn't have much work on checking whether we reach great container support or not. Hance don't really wish it got archived and retired. Still if no one interested enough and have time to join and chair the SIG, we have no option but to move it to retired state ("archived"). So if you're interested in chair the SIG, please raise your hand now. For sure SIGs might be able to bring back to live after we retired it. But I guess will be even better if we got someone take it over and work on it. Again if no one volunteer to chair it, the retire patch [1] will be the way to go. [1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance-sigs/+/783001 *Rico Lin* OIF Board director, OpenSack TC, Multi-arch SIG chair, Heat PTL, Senior Software Engineer@EasyStack *Email: ricolin@ricolky.com <ricolin@ricolky.com>* *Phone: +886-963-612-021*
On 2021-03-25 21:28:29 +0800 (+0800), Rico Lin wrote: [...]
IMO, The goal from Containers SIG definitely provide great value to Openstack community because we didn't have much work on checking whether we reach great container support or not. Hance don't really wish it got archived and retired. Still if no one interested enough and have time to join and chair the SIG, we have no option but to move it to retired state ("archived"). [...]
If there's a set goal for the group, and you can define what you think the end state would be like for "great container support" in OpenStack, then this may be better suited as a pop-up team (that model didn't actually exist when this SIG was originally created). Still, if there's nobody interested in working toward that goal, I agree there's not much point in keeping the group defined either as a SIG or pop-up. https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/popup-teams.html -- Jeremy Stanley
To whom might care, We officially retired Containers SIG now [1]. If you hope to restart this SIG or related effort, it's possible to resume this SIG, have a new pop-up team (as Jeremy mentioned), or other possible formats you think it might be. Feel free to contact me or any TC members if you need help on these matters. [1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance-sigs/+/783001/3 On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 9:56 PM Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> wrote:
On 2021-03-25 21:28:29 +0800 (+0800), Rico Lin wrote: [...]
IMO, The goal from Containers SIG definitely provide great value to Openstack community because we didn't have much work on checking whether we reach great container support or not. Hance don't really wish it got archived and retired. Still if no one interested enough and have time to join and chair the SIG, we have no option but to move it to retired state ("archived"). [...]
If there's a set goal for the group, and you can define what you think the end state would be like for "great container support" in OpenStack, then this may be better suited as a pop-up team (that model didn't actually exist when this SIG was originally created). Still, if there's nobody interested in working toward that goal, I agree there's not much point in keeping the group defined either as a SIG or pop-up.
https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/popup-teams.html
-- Jeremy Stanley
*Rico Lin* OIF Board director, OpenSack TC, Multi-arch SIG chair, Heat PTL, Senior Software Engineer@EasyStack *Email: ricolin@ricolky.com <ricolin@ricolky.com>* *Phone: +886-963-612-021*
participants (2)
-
Jeremy Stanley
-
Rico Lin