[horizon] 2025.2 Flamingo PTG Summary
*Hello everyone,Last Horizon PTG had very interesting and productive topics. We had internal sessions on Tuesday and a cross project session with Watcher and Telemetry teams on Wednesday. All the notes are available here: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/horizon-flamingo-ptg <https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/horizon-flamingo-ptg>Here is a summary of the discussions that we had: - Epoxy Retrospective- New core, new contributors, new SASS compiler library, new feature implemented, more work done on OpenStackSDK migration- Integration and UI tests action items- Switch UI tests to voting- Remove old integration tests from Horizon repository- AngularJS removal plan- Create a blueprint to track work - Analyze the differences between python and JS views - Adjust the tests for new views - Outreachy: post-internship experience- Opportunities, initiatives, ideas- Oslo-config discussion- Review of work remaining - Cross-project session with Watcher and Telemetry- Ideas and PoC of new panels for an admin and a tenant with new metrics- Frameworks discussion- Use-cases- Next steps proposalThanks everyone for joining!* With kind regards, Tatiana
Hi! On 4/17/25 18:05, Tatiana Ovchinnikova wrote:
Oslo-config discussion o Review of work remaining
The local_settings.py has always been very painful to deal with from an operator perspective (ie: horrible puppet templates for me, instead of a nice .ini provider). This task has been ongoing for YEARS. Could you expand a little bit on how much progress has been done, and how much is still not finished? Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)
We stopped at the point where a precise format for the config file has to be defined. That includes the section and option names, and how they translate to the names in the settings.py. You can imagine that this is a bit of a responsibility, because once we do this, any changes to this are going to be compatibility breaking changes. This seems to be the last step required to make it all work. On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 10:57 AM Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> wrote:
Hi!
On 4/17/25 18:05, Tatiana Ovchinnikova wrote:
Oslo-config discussion o Review of work remaining
The local_settings.py has always been very painful to deal with from an operator perspective (ie: horrible puppet templates for me, instead of a nice .ini provider). This task has been ongoing for YEARS.
Could you expand a little bit on how much progress has been done, and how much is still not finished?
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
-- Radomir Dopieralski
participants (3)
-
Radomir Dopieralski
-
Tatiana Ovchinnikova
-
Thomas Goirand