Just testing every release since Train on an LFS system with Python-3.9 cryptography-35.0.0 is necessary Thank you all
On 2021-10-11 10:49:38 +0200 (+0200), tjoen wrote:
Just testing every release since Train on an LFS system with Python-3.9 cryptography-35.0.0 is necessary
Thanks for testing! Just be aware that Python 3.8 is the most recent interpreter targeted by Xena: https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/runtimes/xena.html Discussion is underway at the PTG next week to determine what the tested runtimes should be for Yoga, but testing with 3.9 is being suggested (or maybe even 3.10): https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-yoga-ptg -- Jeremy Stanley
On 10/11/21 16:20, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2021-10-11 10:49:38 +0200 (+0200), tjoen wrote:
Just testing every release since Train on an LFS system with Python-3.9 cryptography-35.0.0 is necessary
Forgotten to mention that that new cryptography only applies to opensl-3.0.0
Thanks for testing! Just be aware that Python 3.8 is the most recent interpreter targeted by Xena:
https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/runtimes/xena.html
Thx for that link. I'll consult it at next release
Discussion is underway at the PTG next week to determine what the tested runtimes should be for Yoga, but testing with 3.9 is being suggested (or maybe even 3.10):
I have put 2022-03-30 in my agenda
---- On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 11:49:51 -0500 tjoen <tjoen@dds.nl> wrote ----
On 10/11/21 16:20, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2021-10-11 10:49:38 +0200 (+0200), tjoen wrote:
Just testing every release since Train on an LFS system with Python-3.9 cryptography-35.0.0 is necessary
Forgotten to mention that that new cryptography only applies to opensl-3.0.0
Just to note, we did Xena testing with py3.9 but as non-voting jobs with cryptography===3.4.8. Now cryptography 35.0.0 is used for current master branch testing (non voting py3.9). -gmann
Thanks for testing! Just be aware that Python 3.8 is the most recent interpreter targeted by Xena:
https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/runtimes/xena.html
Thx for that link. I'll consult it at next release
Discussion is underway at the PTG next week to determine what the tested runtimes should be for Yoga, but testing with 3.9 is being suggested (or maybe even 3.10):
I have put 2022-03-30 in my agenda
On 10/11/21 21:02, Ghanshyam Mann wrote:
---- On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 11:49:51 -0500 tjoen <tjoen@dds.nl> wrote ----
On 2021-10-11 10:49:38 +0200 (+0200), tjoen wrote:
Just testing every release since Train on an LFS system with Python-3.9 cryptography-35.0.0 is necessary
Forgotten to mention that that new cryptography only applies to opensl-3.0.0
Just to note, we did Xena testing with py3.9 but as non-voting jobs with cryptography===3.4.8.
That was the version causing segfaults with openssl-3 Worked in Wallaby with openssl-1.1.1l
Now cryptography 35.0.0 is used for current master branch testing (non voting py3.9).
With openssl-3 I hope
On 2021-10-12 08:44:55 +0200 (+0200), tjoen wrote:
On 10/11/21 21:02, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: [...]
Now cryptography 35.0.0 is used for current master branch testing (non voting py3.9).
With openssl-3 I hope
I don't think any of the LTS distributions we use for testing (CentOS, Ubuntu) have OpenSSL 3.x packages available. Even in Debian, unstable is still using 1.1.1l-1 while 3.0.0-1 is only available from experimental. We may start running some tests with OpenSSL 3.x versions once they begin to appear in Debian/testing or a new Fedora version, but widespread testing with it likely won't happen until we add CentOS 9 Stream or Ubuntu 22.04 LTS (assuming one of those provides it once they exist). -- Jeremy Stanley
participants (3)
-
Ghanshyam Mann
-
Jeremy Stanley
-
tjoen