[stable][glance] Proposal to add Abhishek Kekane to glance-stable-maint
I'd like to propose adding Abhishek Kekane to the Glance stable maintenance team. He's been a glance core for a few years now, and we are currently understaffed in glance-stable-maint. Plus, he's the current Glance PTL. cheers, brian
On 11/12/2019 2:17 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
we are currently understaffed in glance-stable-maint. Plus, he's the current Glance PTL.
glance-stable-maint is understaffed yes. I ran a reviewstats report on glance stable branch reviews over the last 180 days: http://paste.openstack.org/show/786058/ Abhishek has only done 3 stable branch reviews in 6 months which is pretty low but to be fair maybe there aren't that many open reviews on stable branches for glance and the other existing glance-stable-maint cores don't have a lot more reviews either, so maybe that's just par for the course. As for being core on master or being PTL, as you probably know, that doesn't really mean much when it comes to stable branch reviews, which is more about the stable branch guidelines. Nova has a few stable branch cores that aren't core on master because they adhere to the guidelines and do a lot of stable branch reviews. Anyway, I'm OK trusting Abhishek here and adding him to the glance-stable-maint team. Things are such these days that beggars can't really be choosers. -- Thanks, Matt
Hi Matt, I agree, your concern is valid. I have been working in glance since Icehouse and aware about stable branch guidelines. Given the opportunity, I will try my best to justify my selection. Thanks & Best Regards, Abhishek Kekane On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 12:29 AM Matt Riedemann <mriedemos@gmail.com> wrote:
On 11/12/2019 2:17 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
we are currently understaffed in glance-stable-maint. Plus, he's the current Glance PTL.
glance-stable-maint is understaffed yes. I ran a reviewstats report on glance stable branch reviews over the last 180 days:
http://paste.openstack.org/show/786058/
Abhishek has only done 3 stable branch reviews in 6 months which is pretty low but to be fair maybe there aren't that many open reviews on stable branches for glance and the other existing glance-stable-maint cores don't have a lot more reviews either, so maybe that's just par for the course.
As for being core on master or being PTL, as you probably know, that doesn't really mean much when it comes to stable branch reviews, which is more about the stable branch guidelines. Nova has a few stable branch cores that aren't core on master because they adhere to the guidelines and do a lot of stable branch reviews.
Anyway, I'm OK trusting Abhishek here and adding him to the glance-stable-maint team. Things are such these days that beggars can't really be choosers.
--
Thanks,
Matt
participants (3)
-
Abhishek Kekane
-
Brian Rosmaita
-
Matt Riedemann