we miss the maillist address, sorry I start that one....add it back. Alex Xu <soulxu@gmail.com> 于2019年4月16日周二 上午7:16写道：

Sean Mooney <smooney@redhat.com> 于2019年4月16日周二 上午2:27写道：

...

On Mon, 2019-04-15 at 23:16 +0800, Alex Xu wrote:

...

...

?resources=DISK_GB& resources1=VCPU:2,MEMORY_MB:128& resources1.1=VF:1& resources2=VCPU:2,MEMORY_MB:128& resources2.1=VF:1& group_policy=isolate

Is it the case you talking about? Sorry, I probably didn't get what

...

...

mean about changing grouping and group policies. Is there any conflict case from you vision?

Sorry, I miss read your case. It should be

?resources=DISK_GB:10,VF:1& resources1=VCPU:2,MEMORY_MB:128& resources2=VCPU:2,MEMORY_MB:128& group_policy=isolate

VF may get from any RP in the whole tree. no that wont work because it would require the disk_GB and the VF to come

you form the same resouce provideer. so you would have to do

No, that isn't un-numbered resources meaning. DISK_GB and VF are in un-numbered request group. It may get from any RP in the whole tree, and needn't to be same resource provider.

http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/rocky/implemented/gran... "The semantic for the (single) un-numbered grouping is unchanged. That is, it may still return results from different RPs in the same tree (or, when “shared” is fully implemented, the same aggregate)."

...

?resources=DISK_GB:10& resources1=VCPU:2,MEMORY_MB:128& resources2=VCPU:2,MEMORY_MB:128& resoucees3=VF:1 group_policy=isolate

the issue aries if i want 2 VF

do you do ?resources=DISK_GB:10& resources1=VCPU:2,MEMORY_MB:128& resources2=VCPU:2,MEMORY_MB:128& resoucees3=VF:1 resoucees4=VF:1 group_policy=isolate

or ?resources=DISK_GB:10& resources1=VCPU:2,MEMORY_MB:128& resources2=VCPU:2,MEMORY_MB:128& resoucees3=VF:2 group_policy=isolate

or ?resources=DISK_GB:10& resources1=VCPU:2,MEMORY_MB:128& resources2=VCPU:2,MEMORY_MB:128& resoucees3=VF:1 resoucees4=VF:1 grou p_policy=None

i woudl say the last one is the most correct from the neutorn point of view however we lose guarentee teh cpu and ram come form different numa node the first option forces the vif to be form different RP and the second requires them to be form the same RPs

what you really want is ?resources=DISK_GB:10& resources1=VCPU:2,MEMORY_MB:128& resources2=VCPU:2,MEMORY_MB:128& resoucees3=VF:1 resoucees4=VF:1 grou p_policy=isolate;none:3,4

i.e. the vfs can come form any RP in the tree but resouce group 1 an 2 need to be isolated. or said another way by default each resouce group is isolated but resouce groups 3 and 4 have policy none.

...