On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 10:57 AM Balazs Gibizer <balazs.gibizer@est.tech> wrote:


On Mon, Oct 25 2021 at 06:50:12 PM +0200, Sylvain Bauza
<sbauza@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Well, it's a try given we discussed for 4 days and it could be a
> large summary ;)
> You can see all the notes in a read-only etherpad here :
> https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/r.e70aa851abf8644c29c8abe4bce32b81

Thank you Sylvain!

>
> ### Cross-project discussions
>
> # Cyborg cross-project discussion with Nova
> We agreed on adding a OWNED_BY_NOVA trait for all Resource Providers
> creating by Nova so Cyborg would provide their own OWNED_BY_CYBORG
> trait for knowing which inventories are used by either Nova or Cyborg.
> Cyborg contributors need to modify
> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/780452
> We also agreed on the fact that
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/cyborg-suspend-and-resume
> is a specless blueprint.

A small correction. The name of the trait did not changed during the
PTG discussion. It is still OWNER_<project> in the etherpad so
OWNED_BY_<project> seems like a honest mistake here.


Yeah, just a clarification here : I haven't wanted to bikeshed about the trait name during our PTG session but I'm also not sure we have a consensus about it.
FWIW, I'll ask about it on the spec but here, given I was saying "we agreed on adding a 'XXX' trait", I used an adjective instead of a name.

TBC, we have both adjectives and names for our standard traits [1] so I'm fine with both of the traits.

HTH,
-Sylvain

[1] https://docs.openstack.org/os-traits/latest/reference/traits.html

[snip]

>
> # Zombie Resource Providers no longer corresponding to Nova resources
> Thanks to the OWNED_BY_NOVA trait we agreed when discussing with the
> Cyborg team, we could find a way to know the ResourceProviders owned
> by Nova that are no longer in use and we could consequently delete
> them, or warn the operator if existing allocations are present.

and also here.

[snip]

>
> Okay, if you reach this point, you're very brave. Kudos to you.
> I don't really want to reproduce this exercice often, but I just hope
> it helps you summarizing a thousand-line large etherpad.
>
>
> -Sylvain

cheers,
gibi