On 1/11/21 10:57 AM, Moises Guimaraes de Medeiros wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> During Oslo's last weekly meeting [1] we decided that Oslo can take
> cursive under its umbrella with collaboration of Barbican folks. I just
> waited a bit with this confirmation as the Barbican PTL was on PTO and I
> wanted to confirm with him.
>
> What are the next steps from here?

Thanks so much for following up!  I think you need to do something like
these patches from Ghanshyam to move devstack-plugin-nfs from x/ to
openstack/ and bring it under QA governance:

https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/711834
https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/711835

LMK if you want me to propose the patches, my intent is to get this
issue solved, not to make more work for you!

cheers,
brian

>
> [1]:
> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/oslo/2021/oslo.2021-01-04-16.00.log.html#l-64
> <http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/oslo/2021/oslo.2021-01-04-16.00.log.html#l-64>
>
> Thanks,
> Moisés
>
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 10:06 PM Douglas Mendizabal <dmendiza@redhat.com
> <mailto:dmendiza@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>     On 12/16/20 12:50 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
>      >
>      >
>      > On 12/16/20 12:02 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
>      >> Hello Barbican team,
>      >>
>      >> Apologies for not including barbican in the previous thread on this
>      >> topic:
>      >>
>      >>
>     http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-December/019430.html
>     <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-December/019430.html>
>
>      >>
>      >>
>      >> The situation is that cursive is used by Nova, Glance, and
>     Cinder and
>      >> we'd like to move it out of the 'x' namespace into openstack
>      >> governance.   The question is then what team would oversee it.  It
>      >> seems like a good fit for Oslo, and the Oslo team seems OK with
>     that,
>      >> but since barbican-core is currently included in cursive-core,
>     it make
>      >> sense to give the Barbican team first dibs.
>      >>
>      >>  From the consuming teams' side, I don't think we have a
>     preference as
>      >> long as it's clear who we need to bother about approvals if a
>     bugfix
>      >> is posted for review.
>      >>
>      >> Thus my ask is that the Barbican team indicate whether they'd
>     like to
>      >> move cursive to the 'openstack' namespace under their
>     governance, or
>      >> whether they'd prefer Oslo to oversee the library.
>      >
>      > Note that this is not necessarily an either/or thing. Castellan
>     is under
>      > Oslo governance but is co-owned by the Oslo and Barbican teams.
>     We could
>      > do a similar thing with Cursive.
>      >
>
>     Hi Brian and Ben,
>
>     Sorry I missed the original thread.  Given that the end of the year is
>     around the corner, most of the Barbican team is out on PTO and we
>     haven't had a chance to discuss this in our weekly meeting.
>
>     That said, I doubt anyone would object to moving cursive into the
>     openstack namespace.
>
>     I personally do not mind the Oslo team taking over maintenace, and I am
>     also willing to help review patches if the Oslo team would like to
>     co-own this library just like we currently do for Castellan.
>
>     - Douglas Mendizábal (redrobot)
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Moisés Guimarães
>
> Software Engineer
>
> Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com>
>
> <https://red.ht/sig>
>