Le lun. 11 janv. 2021 à 18:11, Ben Nemec <openstack@nemebean.com> a écrit :

On 1/6/21 2:58 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 12/18/20 3:54 PM, hberaud wrote:
>> In a first time I tried to fix our gates by fixing our lower-constraints
>> project by project but with around ~36 projects to maintain this is a
>> painful task, especially due to nested oslo layers inside oslo
>> himself... I saw the face of the hell of dependencies.
>
> Welcome to my world!
>
>> Thoughts?
>
> Couldn't someone address the dependency loops in Oslo? It's IMO anyway
> needed.

AFAIK nobody is volunteering on our side, feel free to send patches to fix them....

Which libraries have circular dependencies? It's something we've
intentionally avoided, so if they exist I would consider it a bug.

Concerning myself, I meant that by example to fix oslo.messaging its LC you should first address those of oslo.log and etc...

This isn't a circular dependency but an order to follow in our patches to fix all our L.C.

Also I didn't notice "real" circular dependencies, in other words I only noticed an order to apply to fix all the L.C, but over 36 projects that order is a bit annoying, that's all.

>
> Just my 2 cents, not sure if that helps...
> Cheers,
>
> Thomas Goirand (zigo)
>

Hervé Beraud

Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat

irc: hberaud

https://github.com/4383/

https://twitter.com/4383hberaud