On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 1:19 PM Christian Rohmann <christian.rohmann@inovex.de> wrote:

On 31.01.24 16:36, Abhishek Kekane wrote:

2. Following the discussion, I was getting a sense that the code changes may not be a lot, in that case, if it's possible to provide a patch,

I can patch my openstack and see how it goes.

Even though changes are trivial, glance uses onion architecture, so it needed changes at a lot places which will take some time. Ideally it’s not possible to provide quick fix for this.

Since we have invested some time looking into this, would it not make sense to write this up in a bug and maybe you could add some of your implementation knowledge as well?
This then seems like a fruit (be it low-hanging or not) that someone could pick.

Otherwise this bug / missing feature discussion just ends up in the ML archive.

Hi Shrishail,

CC: Christian

Is it possible for you to hardcode image_size at [1] and check not passing image_size is the real issue?

I have reported a bug [2] and mentioned it as a possible solution, but if that is not the case then we need to investigate further.

[1] https://github.com/openstack/glance_store/blob/master/glance_store/_drivers/s3.py#L628

[2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/2051914

Thanks,

Abhishek

Regards

Christian