Re: [uc][tc][ops] reviving osops- repos

On 2019-05-31 10:24:36 -0400 (-0400), Erik McCormick wrote: [...]

there's a project [1].

So either: A) Make a SIG out of that and assign the repos to the sig, or B) Maybe add it under / rename the Ops Docs SIG [2] as it might bring more eyes to both things which serve the same folks.

[...]

I'd also be perfectly fine with C) say that it's being vouched for by the UC through its Osops project, stick these repos in a list *somewhere* as a durable record of that, and let decisions about project vs. SIG decision be independent of the repository naming decision.