On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 11:29 AM wodel youchi <wodel.youchi@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks John,
My idea is to learn how to deploy openstack with tripleO like what will be with physical nodes, my goal is not to get openstack up and running to lean how to use it, my goal is to install it in the same way as if it was a physical implementation.
I use tripleo lab for the same reasons while I'm working on TripleO. Tripleo-lab creates the virtual hardware, adds it to Ironic and then installs the undercloud. But that's where I stop using it and then deploy the overcloud myself. In this way I can pretend I'm using physical nodes. I just don't have to deal with the environmental issues from setting up the simulation with VMs myself (e.g. the second issue below /dev/vda does not have a valid MBR). My notes on using tripleo-lab to run the commands like the ones below (though I didn't have the errors you had) are here if it's useful to you: https://github.com/fultonj/xena/tree/main/networkv2 John
About Wallaby, I have tried, but I got other errors :
I followed these documents :
https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/tripleo-docs/latest/features...
https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/tripleo-docs/latest/features...
https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/tripleo-docs/latest/provisio...
At the end I tried these two commands : 1) openstack overcloud node provision --stack overcloud --network-config --output ~/overcloud-baremetal-deployed.yaml ~/templates/ *baremetal-node-net.yaml*
And I this error message :
2021-08-15 15:59:32.402435 | 52540075-9baf-2b0b-5fc8-000000000017 | FATAL | Provision instances | localhost | error={"changed": false, "logging": "Deploy attempt failed on node computeHCI2 (UUID 9440e769-9634-4015-82b0-97b8c1921ef5), cleaning up\nTraceback (most recent call last):\n File \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/metalsmith/_provisioner.py\", line 392, in provision_node\n nics.validate()\n File \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/metalsmith/_nics.py\", line 60, in validate\n result.append(('network', self._get_network(nic)))\n File \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/metalsmith/_nics.py\", line 128, in _get_network\n 'Unexpected fields for a network: %s' % ', '.join(unexpected))\nmetalsmith.exceptions.InvalidNIC: Unexpected fields for a network: subnet\nDeploy attempt failed on node computeHCI0 (UUID 31eecc38-7d80-4ddd-9cc4-a76edf00ec3a), cleaning up\nTraceback (most recent call last):\n File \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/metalsmith/_provisioner.py\", line 392, in provision_node\n nics.validate()\n File \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/metalsmith/_nics.py\", line 60, in validate\n result.append(('network', self._get_network(nic)))\n File \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/metalsmith/_nics.py\", line 128, in _get_network\n 'Unexpected fields for a network: %s' % ', '.join(unexpected))\nmetalsmith.exceptions.InvalidNIC: Unexpected fields for a network: subnet\nDeploy attempt failed on node controller2 (UUID f62f8cb5-40e4-4e40-805d-852c2a2f7e00), cleaning up\nTraceback (most recent call last):\n File \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/metalsmith/_provisioner.py\", line 392, in provision_node\n nics.validate()\n File \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/metalsmith/_nics.py\", line 60, in validate\n result.append(('network', self._get_network(nic)))\n File \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/metalsmith/_nics.py\", line 128, in _get_network\n 'Unexpected fields for a network: %s' % ', '.join(unexpected))\nmetalsmith.exceptions.InvalidNIC: Unexpected fields for a network: subnet\nDeploy attempt failed on node computeHCI1 (UUID 2798b208-4842-4083-9b3f-c46953b52928), cleaning up\nTraceback (most recent call last):\n File \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/metalsmith/_provisioner.py\", line 392, in provision_node\n nics.validate()\n File \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/metalsmith/_nics.py\", line 60, in validate\n result.append(('network', self._get_network(nic)))\n File \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/metalsmith/_nics.py\", line 128, in _get_network\n 'Unexpected fields for a network: %s' % ', '.join(unexpected))\nmetalsmith.exceptions.InvalidNIC: Unexpected fields for a network: subnet\n Deploy attempt failed on node controller1 (UUID df87e5c7-32b0-4bfa-9ef9-f0a98666e7de), cleaning up\nTraceback (most recent call last):\n File \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/metalsmith/_provisioner.py\", line 392, in provision_node\n nics.validate()\n File \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/metalsmith/_nics.py\", line 60, in validate\n result.append(('network', self._get_network(nic)))\n File \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/metalsmith/_nics.py\", line 128, in _get_network\n 'Unexpected fields for a network: %s' % ', '.join(unexpected))\nmetalsmith.exceptions.InvalidNIC: Unexpected fields for a network: subnet\nDeploy attempt failed on node controller0 (UUID af75122c-a6e8-42d7-afd2-571738c42061), cleaning up\nTraceback (most recent call last):\n File \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/metalsmith/_*provisioner.py\", line 392, in provision_node\n nics.validate()\n File \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-**packages/metalsmith/_nics.py\"**, line 60, in validate\n result.append(('network', self._get_network(nic)))\n File \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-**packages/metalsmith/_nics.py\"**, line 128, in _get_network\n 'Unexpected fields for a network: %s' % ', '.join(unexpected))\**nmetalsmith.exceptions.**InvalidNIC: Unexpected fields for a network: subnet\n", "msg": "Unexpected fields for a network: subnet"}*
2) openstack overcloud node provision --stack overcloud --output ~/ overcloud-baremetal-deployed.yaml ~/templates/*baremetal-node**.yaml*
This time I got this error :
2021-08-16 13:47:02.156021 | 52540075-9baf-0672-d7b8-000000000017 | FATAL | Provision instances | localhost | error={"changed": false, "logging": "Created port overcloud-computehci-1-ctlplane (UUID 17e55729-b44b-40a8-9361-9e36e8527de5) for node controller0 (UUID 61bc6512-9c4e-4199-936a-754801f7cffa) with {'network_id': '1c8c5e86-79ac-4ec6-9616-3c965cab6e88', 'name': 'overcloud-computehci-1-ctlplane'}\nCreated port overcloud-controller-0-ctlplane (UUID 0a09bbb5-934d-4d34-ab5b-7c14518d06c6) for node controller1 (UUID 03915e7c-a314-41d9-be8c-46291879692a) with {'network_id': '1c8c5e86-79ac-4ec6-9616-3c965cab6e88', 'name': 'overcloud-controller-0-ctlplane'}\nCreated port overcloud-computehci-2-ctlplane (UUID 76ef56f1-4dbb-453e-a344-968b0da95823) for node computeHCI2 (UUID a5d3552b-ab79-404e-8a52-48dc53a3aa45) with {'network_id': '1c8c5e86-79ac-4ec6-9616-3c965cab6e88', 'name': 'overcloud-computehci-2-ctlplane'}\nCreated port overcloud-computehci-0-ctlplane (UUID 79967f38-90ee-49e6-8716-b09cc9460afe) for node computeHCI1 (UUID 3534309b-c11f-48d4-b23d-3ed9f2dcbf79) with {'network_id': '1c8c5e86-79ac-4ec6-9616-3c965cab6e88', 'name': 'overcloud-computehci-0-ctlplane'}\nCreated port overcloud-controller-1-ctlplane (UUID c70b7c8c-31a6-460e-aa77-ea37b8e332f6) for node controller2 (UUID 83f47771-9f82-4437-8df4-de32bcd6fc63) with {'network_id': '1c8c5e86-79ac-4ec6-9616-3c965cab6e88', 'name': 'overcloud-controller-1-ctlplane'}\nCreated port overcloud-controller-2-ctlplane (UUID 2b74c4e3-705c-4bf1-85de-a5e0a9cdb591) for node computeHCI0 (UUID 3924529b-44a7-4c74-b1e1-2175d6313a3e) with {'network_id': '1c8c5e86-79ac-4ec6-9616-3c965cab6e88', 'name': 'overcloud-controller-2-ctlplane'}\nAttached port overcloud-controller-0-ctlplane (UUID 0a09bbb5-934d-4d34-ab5b-7c14518d06c6) to node controller1 (UUID 03915e7c-a314-41d9-be8c-46291879692a)\nAttached port overcloud-computehci-1-ctlplane (UUID 17e55729-b44b-40a8-9361-9e36e8527de5) to node controller0 (UUID 61bc6512-9c4e-4199-936a-754801f7cffa)\nProvisioning started on node controller1 (UUID 03915e7c-a314-41d9-be8c-46291879692a)\nAttached port overcloud-computehci-2-ctlplane (UUID 76ef56f1-4dbb-453e-a344-968b0da95823) to node computeHCI2 (UUID a5d3552b-ab79-404e-8a52-48dc53a3aa45)\nAttached port overcloud-computehci-0-ctlplane (UUID 79967f38-90ee-49e6-8716-b09cc9460afe) to node computeHCI1 (UUID 3534309b-c11f-48d4-b23d-3ed9f2dcbf79)\nProvisioning started on node controller0 (UUID 61bc6512-9c4e-4199-936a-754801f7cffa)\nAttached port overcloud-controller-1-ctlplane (UUID c70b7c8c-31a6-460e-aa77-ea37b8e332f6) to node controller2 (UUID 83f47771-9f82-4437-8df4-de32bcd6fc63)\nProvisioning started on node computeHCI2 (UUID a5d3552b-ab79-404e-8a52-48dc53a3aa45)\nProvisioning started on node computeHCI1 (UUID 3534309b-c11f-48d4-b23d-3ed9f2dcbf79)\nAttached port overcloud-controller-2-ctlplane (UUID 2b74c4e3-705c-4bf1-85de-a5e0a9cdb591) to node computeHCI0 (UUID 3924529b-44a7-4c74-b1e1-2175d6313a3e)\nProvisioning started on node controller2 (UUID 83f47771-9f82-4437-8df4-de32bcd6fc63)\nProvisioning started on node computeHCI0 (UUID 3924529b-44a7-4c74-b1e1-2175d6313a3e)\n", "msg": "Node *a5d3552b-ab79-404e-8a52-**48dc53a3aa45 reached failure state \"deploy failed\"; the last error is Agent returned error for deploy step {'step': 'write_image', 'priority': 80, 'argsinfo': None, 'interface': 'deploy'} on node a5d3552b-ab79-404e-8a52-**48dc53a3aa45 : Error performing deploy_step write_image: Command execution failed: Failed to check the number of primary partitions present on /dev/vda for node a5d3552b-ab79-404e-8a52-**48dc53a3aa45. Error: The device /dev/vda does not have a valid MBR partition table."}*
Any ideas? thanks in advance.
Regards.
Le mer. 18 août 2021 à 16:01, John Fulton <johfulto@redhat.com> a écrit :
Hi Wodel,
Yes, it's possible to deploy openstack with tripleo using VMs and nested-KVM for the compute node. I personally use this tool on my hypervisor to do it.
https://github.com/cjeanner/tripleo-lab
By trying to get tripleo working with nested KVM without using a tool like the above you might eventually create your own version of the same tool though using the above helps you skip those steps.
The issue you're hitting from the error message below looks like the Nova scheduler on the undercloud not finding an Ironic node that satisfies the scheduling criteria. This can be debugged but you might find it easier to just not have the problem by letting another tool deal with this for you. Also, with wallaby and newer tripleo does not use Nova on the undercloud and instead the recommended deployment process is to use metalsmith as described here:
https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/tripleo-docs/latest/provisio...
You also have the standalone option of using tripleo on a single VM:
https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/tripleo-docs/latest/deployme...
John
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 10:28 AM wodel youchi <wodel.youchi@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, I am trying to deploy openstack with tripleO using VMs and nested-KVM for the compute node. This is for test and learning purposes.
I am using the Train version and following some tutorials. I prepared my different template files and started the deployment, but I got these errors :
*Failed to provision instance fc40457e-4b3c-4402-ae9d-c528f2c2ad30: Asynchronous exception: Node failed to deploy. Exception: Agent API for node 6d3724fc-6f13-4588-bbe5-56bc4f9a4f87 returned HTTP status code 404 with error: Not found: Extension with id iscsi not found. for node*
and
*Got HTTP 409: {"errors": [{"status": 409, "title": "Conflict", "detail": "There was a conflict when trying to complete your request.\n\n Unable to allocate inventory: Unable to create allocation for 'CUSTOM_BAREMETAL' on resource provider '6d3724fc-6f13-4588-bbe5-56bc4f9a4f87'. The requested amount would exceed the capacity. ",*
Could you help understand what those errors mean? I couldn't find anything similar on the net.
Thanks in advance.
Regards.