Side note inline On 2/11/25 7:36 PM, Jay Faulkner wrote:
On 2/11/25 10:14 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
I'm happy to become the tact-sig liaison if there are no better takers. I think I still have a pretty solid mental model of our CI jobs, as well as hands-on experience in fixing them :)
As an aside, the Bug Deputy role is distributed itself in our case, right?
Yeah, I would suggest we keep this as a rotating role; even if lately CID has been picking it up more often than not :).
By my calculations we have the following volunteers:
- Release Liason: Riccardo
- tact-sig Liason: Dmitry
- Security Liason: Jay (me)
- TC Liason: likely Doug (cardoe) but need to check with him
- Events Liason: Iury
I think this sounds like enough consensus to move forward; we can add more liasons if needed later.
I suggest a plan where we expect Ironic to go through the leaderless process to get DPL. Unless there is objection, I will monitor and if anyone unexpectedly runs for Ironic PTL, I will also submit my nomination for PTL on a platform of "make Ironic DPL". I doubt that will be needed though.
I doubt it too, but that's an interesting shortcoming of the DPL model: even if the team decides to go DPL, anyone qualifying can force their PTL-ship on the team. Like, literally a random contributor can get this important role and the team can do nothing about it? Needs improving IMO. Dmitry
Does this ound OK to everyone?
-Jay
Dmitry
On 2/10/25 5:35 PM, Jay Faulkner wrote:
At today's Ironic meeting, many cores were around to discuss a potential move to the DPL model. This allows the project to continue our practice of distributed leadership without having to have a song and dance every six months about who will bear the PTL title :).
https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/distributed-project-leadership... documents required and optional roles for DPL model. These are listed below for clarity:
(required)
- Release liason
- tact-sig liason (CI)
- Security liason
- TC liason
(optional)
- Events liason
- Project Update/Onboarding liason
- Meeting Facilitator
- Bug Deputy
- RFE Coordinator
I'd suggest that for Ironic purposes, we obviously need someone in each of the required roles; but I'd strongly suggest we also assign an events liason so we have a single point of responsibility for PTG signup and planning.
Along these lines, if we'd like Ironic to go to DPL, I will volunteer to be the Security liason.
One concern raised in the Ironic meeting is that the DPL is traditionally associated with low-activity projects; Ironic is an extremely active project with multiple senior developers working on it -- our move to DPL is simply meant to model our actual working mode with everyone pitching in as needed.
What do folks think? If you are in favor of a move to DPL, I'd suggest volunteering for a liason role.
Thanks, Jay Faulkner
On 2/6/25 7:27 AM, Riccardo Pittau wrote:
Hello ironicers!
It's been a pleasure and an honor to serve as PTL for 2 cycles. I've decided to not be a candidate for the next cycle, mainly because of time constraints. Huge thanks to the community for having me, I hope in the future I'll be able to repeat the experience.
Ciao! Riccardo
#irc rpittau