That sync is exactly what I hoped

>

I propose that after the Ironic meeting on March 20, we shortly sync up in the Bobcat PTG etherpad (https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/ironic-bobcat-ptg) to pick topics and assign time.

^ that would be.

Does that sound good to you? If it comes out in there we need more time, we should also have interested parties around to book it.

-Jay

On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 2:41 PM Julia Kreger <juliaashleykreger@gmail.com> wrote:

I think there is a bit of a challenge to navigate though in that the PTG as a sync point is needed especially on items which may take more than just one cycle to deliver. A great example is driver composition. The other unknown is if people are just not interested in some topics, which can result in that topic being very quick.

One thing we also did in the past is guess how much time as a group in advance. I know for a few cycles we had a quick 15 minute call to discuss sizing.  Based upon output from that, I think we could adjust the time slots accordingly. Maybe that might make sense to do?

-Julia

On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 2:08 PM Jay Faulkner <jay@gr-oss.io> wrote:

I'm not opposed to adding more time necessarily, but I wonder if the solution is to triage what we talk about better.

Last PTG, we planned several features which we didn't have enough contribution to complete. IMO, it might be better to limit what we discuss to things that are likely to be accomplished next cycle. If we can't determine that without more discussion, then sure, let's add vPTG sessions..

Is there a suggestion as to specifically what times, and how much to add?

Thanks,

Jay Faulkner

[trim]