Hello,

First, thanks Ben for this email.

I'm personally in favor of experimenting with the DPL on oslo during W.

If nobody wants the release liaison role then I volunteer to keep this role during W.

I also volunteer to become the meeting chair if nobody else wants that role, we need to ensure that we continue to run our weekly meetings, especially with a distributed governance model.

I think that our core members can match well with the majority of listed roles and they can easily assume some of these who are not yet assigned.

Also to continue with this topic we need to follow the related process [1], Ben do you plan to submit the related patch?

[1] https://governance.openstack.org/tc/resolutions/20200803-distributed-project-leadership.html#process-for-opting-in-to-distributed-leadership

Le mer. 30 sept. 2020 à 23:50, Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> a écrit :

On 2020-09-30 16:35:10 -0500 (-0500), Ben Nemec wrote:
[...]
> The general consensus from the people I've talked to seems to be a
> distributed model. To kick off that discussion, here's a list of roles that
> I think should be filled in some form:
>
> * Release liaison
> * Security point-of-contact
> * TC liaison
> * Cross-project point-of-contact
> * PTG/Forum coordinator
> * Meeting chair
> * Community goal liaison (almost forgot this one since I haven't actually
> been doing it ;-).
>
> I've probably missed a few, but those are the the ones I came up with to
> start.
[...]

The TC resolution on distributed project leadership also includes a
recommended list of liaison roles, though it's basically what you
outlined above:

https://governance.openstack.org/tc/resolutions/20200803-distributed-project-leadership.html

--
Jeremy Stanley

Hervé Beraud

Senior Software Engineer

Red Hat - Openstack Oslo

irc: hberaud