On Mon, 29 Apr 2019, Eric Fried wrote:
a) It assumes the meaning of "same tree" is "one level down from the root".
Does it? I had casually interpreted "group_policy=same_tree:$GROUP_A:$GROUP_B" as meaning '$GROUP_B is somewhere within the tree rooted at $GROUP_A at any level' but it could just as easily be interpreted a few different ways, including what you say.
If I interpret that ^ correctly, it would require $GROUP_A (the subtree root) to provide resources, a scenario for which we have at least one counterexample (the one with network agents as resourceless providers).
Why would it require GROUP_A to provide resources? Haven't we already established that we're going to need to lighten the requirement that 'requiredN' must have a 'resourcesN'? If we haven't, perhaps this is the thing that will push us that way? -- Chris Dent ٩◔̯◔۶ https://anticdent.org/ freenode: cdent tw: @anticdent