yeah, same here, I would like to have a dedicated network :) but (as now popular to say) #reallife :D

Thank you. Will take a look at the upgrade.


On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 03:32, Harald Jensas <hjensas@redhat.com> wrote:
On 12/7/20 8:27 PM, Oliver Walsh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The provisioning network needs to be isolated, typically by using VLANs
> on the switch:
> https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/tripleo-docs/latest/environments/baremetal.html#networking
> <https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/tripleo-docs/latest/environments/baremetal.html#networking>
>
> In general, you can only have one DHCP server on an L2 network (ignoring
> high-availability DHCP setups).
>
> Thanks,
> Ollie
>

I fully agree with Ollie here, you should have the provisioning leg of
the undercloud on a isolated VLAN.

However, if you cant get an isolated network segment, and are on
Victoria release ironic inspector has a new option that can be used to
make the inspector DHCP server only answer requests from known MAC
addresses, see:
https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic-inspector/+/753435


//
Harald

>
> On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 19:34, Ruslanas Gžibovskis <ruslanas@lpic.lt
> <mailto:ruslanas@lpic.lt>> wrote:
>
>     Hi all,
>
>     I have a situation, when in my network, I have loads of equipment,
>     which I do not control. and Inspection range gets occupied quite fast.
>
>     and in TCP dump I get such messages:
>         DHCP-Message Option 53, length 1: NACK
>         Server-ID Option 54, length 4: DHCPD-IP
>         MSG Option 56, length 21: "address not available"
>
>     I have disabled: enabled_node_discovery = false
>
>     Anything else?
>
>     maybe additional environment options for undercloud I could provide?
>
>     Than kyou in advance, have a good $day_time
>     --
>     Ruslanas Gžibovskis
>     +370 6030 7030
>




--
Ruslanas Gžibovskis
+370 6030 7030