Hi Alfredo, I know some utilities are not installed on the fedora image but on my installation it is not a problem. As you wrote there are some issues on networking. I've never used openstack-ansible, so I cannot help you. I am sorry Ignazio Il giorno gio 7 feb 2019 alle ore 09:17 Alfredo De Luca < alfredo.deluca@gmail.com> ha scritto:
hi Ignazio. Unfortunately doesn't resolve either with ping or curl .... but what is strange also it doesn't have yum or dnf o any installer ....unless it use only atomic.....
I think at the end it\s the issue with the network as I found out my all-in-one deployment doesn't have the br-ex which it supposed to be the external network interface.
I installed OS with ansible-openstack
Cheers
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 3:39 PM Ignazio Cassano <ignaziocassano@gmail.com> wrote:
Alfredo it is very strange you can ping 8.8.8.8 but you cannot resolve names. I think atomic command uses names for finishing master installation. Curl is installed on master....
Il giorno Mer 6 Feb 2019 09:00 Alfredo De Luca <alfredo.deluca@gmail.com> ha scritto:
Hi Ignazio. sorry for late reply. security group is fine. It\s not blocking the network traffic.
Not sure why but, with this fedora release I can finally find atomic but there is no yum,nslookup,dig,host command..... why is so different from another version (latest) which had yum but not atomic.
It's all weird
Cheers
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 5:46 PM Ignazio Cassano <ignaziocassano@gmail.com> wrote:
Alfredo, try to check security group linked to your kubemaster.
Il giorno Lun 4 Feb 2019 14:25 Alfredo De Luca < alfredo.deluca@gmail.com> ha scritto:
Hi Ignazio. Thanks for the link...... so
Now at least atomic is present on the system. Also I ve already had 8.8.8.8 on the system. So I can connect on the floating IP to the kube master....than I can ping 8.8.8.8 but for example doesn't resolve the names...so if I ping 8.8.8.8 *root@my-last-wdikr74tynij-master-0 log]# ping 8.8.8.8* *PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8) 56(84) bytes of data.* *64 bytes from 8.8.8.8 <http://8.8.8.8>: icmp_seq=1 ttl=118 time=12.1 ms* *64 bytes from 8.8.8.8 <http://8.8.8.8>: icmp_seq=2 ttl=118 time=12.2 ms*
but if I ping google.com doesn't resolve. I can't either find on fedora dig or nslookup to check resolv.conf has *search openstacklocal my-last-wdikr74tynij-master-0.novalocal* *nameserver 8.8.8.8*
It\s all so weird.
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 1:02 PM Ignazio Cassano < ignaziocassano@gmail.com> wrote:
I also suggest to change dns in your external network used by magnum. Using openstack dashboard you can change it to 8.8.8.8 (If I remember fine you wrote that you can ping 8.8.8.8 from kuke baster)
Il giorno lun 4 feb 2019 alle ore 12:39 Alfredo De Luca < alfredo.deluca@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> thanks ignazio > Where can I get it from? > > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 11:45 AM Ignazio Cassano < > ignaziocassano@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I used fedora-magnum-27-4 and it works >> >> Il giorno lun 4 feb 2019 alle ore 09:42 Alfredo De Luca < >> alfredo.deluca@gmail.com> ha scritto: >> >>> Hi Clemens. >>> So the image I downloaded is this >>> https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-29-updates-2... >>> which is the latest I think. >>> But you are right...and I noticed that too.... It doesn't have >>> atomic binary >>> the os-release is >>> >>> *NAME=Fedora* >>> *VERSION="29 (Cloud Edition)"* >>> *ID=fedora* >>> *VERSION_ID=29* >>> *PLATFORM_ID="platform:f29"* >>> *PRETTY_NAME="Fedora 29 (Cloud Edition)"* >>> *ANSI_COLOR="0;34"* >>> *CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:fedoraproject:fedora:29"* >>> *HOME_URL="https://fedoraproject.org/ >>> <https://fedoraproject.org/>"* >>> *DOCUMENTATION_URL="https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/f29/system-administrators-guide/ >>> <https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/f29/system-administrators-guide/>"* >>> *SUPPORT_URL="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicating_and_getting_help >>> <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicating_and_getting_help>"* >>> *BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ >>> <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/>"* >>> *REDHAT_BUGZILLA_PRODUCT="Fedora"* >>> *REDHAT_BUGZILLA_PRODUCT_VERSION=29* >>> *REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT="Fedora"* >>> *REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT_VERSION=29* >>> *PRIVACY_POLICY_URL="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal:PrivacyPolicy >>> <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal:PrivacyPolicy>"* >>> *VARIANT="Cloud Edition"* >>> *VARIANT_ID=cloud* >>> >>> >>> so not sure why I don't have atomic tho >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 7:53 PM Clemens < >>> clemens.hardewig@crandale.de> wrote: >>> >>>> Now to the failure of your part-013: Are you sure that you used >>>> the glance image ‚fedora-atomic-latest‘ and not some other fedora image? >>>> Your error message below suggests that your image does not contain ‚atomic‘ >>>> as part of the image … >>>> >>>> + _prefix=docker.io/openstackmagnum/ >>>> + atomic install --storage ostree --system --system-package no >>>> --set REQUESTS_CA_BUNDLE=/etc/pki/tls/certs/ca-bundle.crt --name >>>> heat-container-agent >>>> docker.io/openstackmagnum/heat-container-agent:queens-stable >>>> ./part-013: line 8: atomic: command not found >>>> + systemctl start heat-container-agent >>>> Failed to start heat-container-agent.service: Unit >>>> heat-container-agent.service not found. >>>> >>>> Am 02.02.2019 um 17:36 schrieb Alfredo De Luca < >>>> alfredo.deluca@gmail.com>: >>>> >>>> Failed to start heat-container-agent.service: Unit >>>> heat-container-agent.service not found. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> *Alfredo* >>> >>> > > -- > *Alfredo* > >
-- *Alfredo*
-- *Alfredo*
-- *Alfredo*