Hi.

I would to like how does it impact when we do with  --shared-migration or  --block-migration?

Nguyen Huu Khoi


On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 1:40 AM <smooney@redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, 2023-11-29 at 21:19 +0700, Nguyễn Hữu Khôi wrote:
> Hi @Sean Mooney <smooney@redhat.com>.
> Thank you for comments.
>
> Could you help me to understand why it is a bad practice if we use
> --shared-migration or  --block-migration?

generally admins frequently get this wrong and nova can determin the correct settting
automatically


>
> Nguyen Huu Khoi
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 9:06 PM <smooney@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > sorry to top post but just a few general comments
> >
> > first we supprot live migration with or without config drive so
> > that shoudl not be a problem
> >
> > second passign --block-migation or similer is condierd bad partcies
> >
> > we added auto as a value in mitaka
> >
> > https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/reference/api-microversion-history.html#maximum-in-mitaka
> >
> > so if you want to triger a migration of the amphora instace regardless of
> > how the storage is providsioned
> > you should use microverion 2.25 or higher and use the auto mode.
> >
> > openstack --os-compute-api 2.25 server migrate  --live-migration <uuid>
> >
> > do not use --shared-migration or  --block-migration  both can and shoudl
> > be considerd legacy
> > you shoudl also ignore the  --disk-overcommit and  --no-disk-overcommit
> > those were remvoed in mitka too.
> >
> > wether or not live migration of a loadblance is advisable in general is a
> > sepreate matter
> > but just form a nova perspecteive a live migrage via os shoudl look like
> > this
> >
> > openstack --os-compute-api 2.30 server migrate  --live-migration [--host
> > <hostname>] [--wait] <uuid>
> >
> > and a cold migrate shoudl look like this
> >
> > openstack --os-compute-api 2.56 server migrate  [--host <host>] [--wait]
> > <uuid>
> >
> > where [] is optional sections and <> are required parmaters.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 2023-11-29 at 19:29 +0700, Nguyễn Hữu Khôi wrote:
> > > 👍
> > >
> > > Nguyễn reacted via Gmail
> > > <
> > https://www.google.com/gmail/about/?utm_source=gmail-in-product&utm_medium=et&utm_campaign=emojireactionemail#app
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2023, 7:25 PM Takashi Kajinami <
> > kajinamit@oss.nttdata.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Ah, yes. config-drive. That's a good point.
> > > >
> > > > When config-drive is used then nova creates a local disk file which
> > stores
> > > > instance metadata
> > > > and attach the disk to an instance. The cloud-init service in the
> > instance
> > > > detects the disk and
> > > > read metadata from the disk rather than metadata api. In case an
> > instance
> > > > with config drive
> > > > is migrated then the drive file should be also transferred to the
> > > > destination compute node,
> > > > and that's why block migration is required.
> > > >
> > > > AFAIK Octavia is heavily dependent on instance metadata. There is an
> > > > option to use usual
> > > > user data instead of config driver but the option is deprecated
> > because of
> > > > known problems
> > > > caused by sizelimit in user data[1], and now config drive is required
> > for
> > > > all amphora instances.
> > > >
> > > > So as a result, live migration of amphora instances need block
> > migration,
> > > > even if volume
> > > > boot is used, unless you have shared NFS storage in your compute nodes.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/855441
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 11/29/23 21:01, Nguyễn Hữu Khôi wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hello.
> > > >
> > > > I mean I use volume boot for Octavia Instance. I check and no local
> > disk
> > > > is used by any instance on my compute node.
> > > >
> > > > However, I don't know why I can do live migration with block migration.
> > > >
> > > > I read from redhat:
> > > >
> > > > If the instance uses config-drive, block migration is required to
> > > > live-migrate the instance
> > > >
> > > > This command to check:
> > > >
> > > > openstack server show <instance name/id> -c config_drive
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > My Octavia instance returns "True".
> > > >
> > > > Nguyen Huu Khoi
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 6:12 PM Takashi Kajinami <
> > > > kajinamit@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 11/29/23 17:34, Nguyễn Hữu Khôi wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > I am using share storage for Octavia instance.
> > > > >
> > > > > Do you mind elaborating the "share strage" here ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Are you using volume backed amphora or shared storage in your compute
> > > > > nodes ?
> > > > >
> > > > > In case you have shared storage among some compute nodes then I'd
> > suggest
> > > > > you check
> > > > > source-destination compute nodes and see whether these two nodes are
> > > > > actually using
> > > > > the same shared storage for instance data (usually located at
> > > > > /var/lib/nova/instances )
> > > > >
> > > > > If you are using volume backed amphora then I may check the libvirt
> > xml
> > > > > of the amphora
> > > > > instance and also the nova flavor used, to find out any local disk
> > device
> > > > > attached
> > > > > (eg. If the flavor has swap then it may attach an additional local
> > device)
> > > > >
> > > > > We can mv Octavia instances by failover but if there is a hundred of
> > lb
> > > > > then it will be a big problem. I am planning to use specific
> > computers for
> > > > > Octavia only and use Active-Standby Topologies.
> > > > >
> > > > > Nguyen Huu Khoi
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 3:16 PM Takashi Kajinami <
> > > > > kajinamit@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > This is not an issue with Octavia but is more about usage of Nova.
> > > > > > By default, amphora instances are deployed using image boot, and
> > use
> > > > > > ephemeral disks stored in compute nodes. Unless you have a shared
> > storage
> > > > > > in your compute nodes to store ephemeral disks(nfs, ceph and so
> > on),
> > > > > > you have to enable block-migration to live migrate the instance.
> > > > > > (See --block-migration option in openstack CLI)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > However, AFAIK the general recommendation is to try amphora
> > failover
> > > > > > (which internally recreates the amphora instance) instead of
> > > > > > live-migrating it,
> > > > > > as is described in the guide[1]. You might want to try that method
> > > > > > instead.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1]
> > > > > >
> > https://docs.openstack.org/octavia/latest/admin/guides/operator-maintenance.html#evacuating-a-specific-amphora-
> > > > > > from-a-host
> > > > > > On 11/29/23 14:17, Nguyễn Hữu Khôi wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hello everyone.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I deploy amphora instances using shared storage but when I do live
> > > > > > migrate it to another host, I encounter this error.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *Error: *Failed to live migrate instance to host "AUTO_SCHEDULE".
> > > > > > Details <https://cloudhn.fpt.net/admin/instances/#message_details>
> > > > > > compute12 is not on shared storage: Shared storage live-migration
> > > > > > requires either shared storage or boot-from-volume with no local
> > disks
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Woud we have a solution for this?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thank you.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Nguyen Huu Khoi
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> >
> >