On Wed Oct 26 2022 11:24:37 GMT-0700 (Pacific Daylight Time), Kendall Nelson <kennelson11@gmail.com> wrote:
No that wasn't the plan. I think the Forum will also still happen as per usual.
TBH, I wouldn't mind it (and I think I would actually prefer it) if we went back to the OG model of having the summit and the design summit at the same time. I was never into the split off into the PTG but wanted to be open minded. I think having the user-oriented energy of the summit combined with the ability to participate on the dev side at the same event was a good thing. I might be alone in this feeling though. That said, I think gmann highlighted the challenge with this would be how we really need to have two events per year to collaborate on each upcoming release. I wonder if we could do one co-located event with the summit and then a virtual PTG for the other cycle? I dunno if the virtual PTG is too resource intensive. I'm generally not a fan of virtual events but I have quite liked the virtual PTG. I think it has been running really smoothly and very productive. Just my 2c. -melwitt
On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 11:29 AM Sean Mooney <smooney@redhat.com <mailto:smooney@redhat.com>> wrote:
On Wed, 2022-10-26 at 11:13 -0500, Kendall Nelson wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 1:52 PM Ghanshyam Mann <gmann@ghanshyammann.com <mailto:gmann@ghanshyammann.com>> > wrote: > > > ---- On Tue, 25 Oct 2022 11:32:46 -0700 Kendall Nelson wrote --- > > > Hello Everyone! > > > Congratulations on a great virtual PTG last week :) > > > > > > The OpenInfra Foundation is hosting the OpenInfra Summit in Vancouver > > [1], June 13 -15, 2023. > > > We are trying to determine the level of interest among contributors to > > OpenInfra projects on attending a co-located PTG in Vancouver. The exact > > format and dates are still being determined. At this time, we are > > evaluating the level of interest from an attendee and employer perspective. > > Please complete the following poll so we can measure the level of interest > > and plan accordingly. Future updates will be distributed to the project > > mailing lists as well as previous PTG attendees. > > > > > > > Thanks, Kendall for collecting the feedback and survey. One question to > > understand the future PTGs schedule. > > > > As PTGs are aligned with the OpenStack new development cycle timing, they > > were very helpful to plan the > > new cycle features/work well at the start of the cycle. But seeing the > > summit co-located PTG timing which > > is June, I am curious to know if there will be a PTG for the 2023.2 (B) > > cycle in April (with 2023.1 Antelope releasing > > at the March end) also? Or we are going to have only one in June which > > will be co-located in Vancouver Summit (once > > it is final based on survey results). > > > > We would still do the usual virtual PTG on the ''normal" timeline. This > potential add on to Vancouver would be in addition to the virtual PTG. so replacing the fourm?
> > > > Definitely, having a co-located PTGs in Summit is a very good idea, saving > > travel, and being much more productive also > > but it's just timing from OpenStack release perspective making it a little > > bit difficult. > > > > -gmann > > > > > Poll: > > https://openinfrafoundation.formstack.com/forms/openinfra_ptg_2023 <https://openinfrafoundation.formstack.com/forms/openinfra_ptg_2023> > > > > > > As a reminder, we are also gathering feedback for the virtual PTG here: > > https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/Oct2022_PTGFeedback <https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/Oct2022_PTGFeedback> > > > > > > -Kendall Nelson (diablo_rojo) > > > [1] https://openinfra.dev/summit/ <https://openinfra.dev/summit/> > >