On 5/12/19 9:05 am, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 5/12/19 6:26 am, Jean-Philippe Evrard wrote:
On Wed, 2019-12-04 at 22:18 -0500, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 4/12/19 6:50 pm, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
Tangential to election scheduling but still on the topic of election planning, last cycle a bunch of folks jumped on the "let's shrink the TC!" bandwagon *while* the election process was already underway. That was of course not an appropriate time to talk about changes to election parameters. But now(ish) *is* the right time.
So to reopen that discussion we previously put a pin in, how many TC seats should we fill in the coming election, and how many should we delete? There were a few different suggestions, some following a less aggressive timeline than others. We would normally have 7 seats up for grabs in the coming round... do we reduce it to 6 (and work with an even-number-sized TC), or just 5 (targeting a TC of 11 for Ussuri into "V")? Or something even more drastic like just letting them all expire and filling none, immediately down-sizing to a TC of 6 members? Thoughts?
This is pretty well-settled:
https://review.opendev.org/681266
(At least assuming we ignore the fact that JP merged it when it had only 8 of the 9 required votes, which I only just noticed. Naughty JP.)
You know I like being naughty! However, I don't think I was it this time: For a TC of 13 members, 7 is the simple majority. We had consensus too :)
But amending the charter itself requires 2/3 majority:
https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/charter.html#amendment
Closing the loop on this, we got 3 more TC members to retroactively comment with their approval, so the rules are satisfied. I proposed a tweak to the documentation to help remind us that we should use the `charter-change` tag rather than `formal-vote` in future - it's currently easy to miss because of the non-locality of the documentation sections describing them: https://review.opendev.org/697511 - ZB