Hi, Sorry for my late response, I am a little bit busy for internal works recently. If TC has decided to retire murano, I have no objection. But If TC think someone can keep maintain it and not retire, I am glad to keeping maintain Murano project. Please reconsider this. Thanks, Rong Zhu Thierry Carrez <thierry@openstack.org>于2021年8月14日 周六22:41写道：
Today, at the TC weekly meeting, it was brought up that Murano was not very active over the past few years and most likely has had a major amount of bitrot. The community is not able to reach the current PTL of the project either.
Personally, I think that at this point, Murano is a bit past it's time. We've got a lot more developments in application deployment nowadays, OpenStack offers things like Magnum to get a Kubernetes cluster which you can run workloads on via Helm, or projects like Zun offer serverlerss containers directly, making a lot of what Murano used to do not so helpful in the current landscape.
I'm sending this email to discuss/propose the idea of retiring the
Mohammed Naser wrote: project.
+1 due to:
- low adoption - peripheral nature (no other project depends on it) - superseded by other software distribution strategies (containers)
zhurong has done a great job at keeping it alive from a release standpoint, but I have no idea how usable it actually is today.
-- Thierry
-- Thanks, Rong Zhu