On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 05:01:31PM -0500, Eric Fried wrote:
Okay, I'll bite.
Not bite ... add your sought after opinio ;P <SNIP>
I would be supportive of the continuation of the effort to move nova-powervm into nova proper. Now, I happen to know from firsthand experience that the code is excellent - certainly way prettier than a lot of the legacy gorp in the libvirt driver. Nevertheless, whether by switching governance or porting the code into the nova project, it would be irresponsible of the nova team to assume ownership without thorough review. I don't think anyone is arguing with that, including Matthew:
Switching governance doesn't require the core-team to change and the point at which nova-core takes over from nova-powervm-core is when the code moves into openstack/nova. <SNIP>
In the meantime, while there is still a significant gap between the in-tree and out-of-tree versions, it definitely makes sense for the *-powervm projects to have their own core team(s) and PTL.
core-team sure, but what is it that a PTL does/can do that a SIG chair can't? Yours Tony.