OooOOOo I like this idea! Would be super awesome to get a list of all the worst, most painful issues and then fix them :) -Kendall On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 3:32 PM Julia Kreger <juliaashleykreger@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 2:40 PM Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> wrote:
On 2021-06-28 14:25:12 -0700 (-0700), Kendall Nelson wrote: [...]
the next release (Y release).
You gave me a scare, but... *phew* that's the release after next. We haven't released Xena yet!
It looks like we only have one goal suggested so far (which is fine; we can only have one goal) [...]
Can we only have one goal? Or can we have only one goal? I assume you mean the latter, but they're definitely different things. -- Jeremy Stanley
I have a crazy idea!
What if instead of a common singular goal to uniformly raise the bar across projects, we have each project work on their *most* painful operator perceived performance or experience issue and attempt to try and eliminate the issue or perception? And where cross-project integrations are involved, other projects could put review priority on helping get fixes or improvements pushed forward to address such operator experiences.
Such an effort would take a dramatically different appearance by project, and would really require each project to identify a known issue, and then to report it back along with the gain they yielded from the effort. Of course, to get there, projects would also have to ensure that they could somehow measure the impact of their changes to remedy such an issue.