On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 5:13 PM Matt Riedemann <mriedemos@gmail.com> wrote:
On 11/18/2019 3:40 PM, Mohammed Naser wrote:
The proposal that I had was that in mind would be for us to let teams self manage their own stable branches. I think we've reached a point where we can trust most of our community to be familiar with the stable branch policy (and let teams decide for themselves what they believe is best for the success of their own projects).
So for a project like nova that has a separate nova-core [1] and nova-stable-maint team [2] where some from [2] aren't in [1], what does this mean? Drop [2] and just rely on [1]? That won't work for those in nova-core that aren't familiar enough with the stable branch guidelines or simply don't care to review stable branch changes, and won't work for those that are in nova-stable-maint but not nova-core.
Thanks for bringing this up, I think we'll slowly iron those out. I think this can be a team-specific decision, we should have $project-stable-maint for every single project anyways, and the team could decide to put all of $project-core inside of it, or a select group of people.
[1] https://review.opendev.org/#/admin/groups/25,members [2] https://review.opendev.org/#/admin/groups/540,members
--
Thanks,
Matt