23 May
2025
23 May
'25
7:11 a.m.
On 5/23/25 12:57 AM, Sean Mooney wrote:
i actully think it woudl be incorrect too.
In item "c", it addresses this kind of signoff. "The contribution was provided directly to me by some other person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified it." https://developercertificate.org/ While I agree a rebase doesn't *need* a signoff, I should not say it's incorrect to add one. In fact, in other communities that use DCO (like Gentoo), I am required to add a signoff for any patch passing through my hands, even if I don't directly modify it. -JayF