On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 13:04, Balázs Gibizer balazs.gibizer@est.tech wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 18:12, Luigi Toscano ltoscano@redhat.com wrote:
On Thursday, 24 September 2020 17:23:36 CEST Stephen Finucane wrote:
Assuming no one steps forward for the Placement PTL role, it would appear to me that we have two options. Either we look at transitioning Placement to a PTL-less project, or we move it back under nova governance. To be honest, given how important placement is to nova and other projects now, I'm uncomfortable with the idea of not having a point person who is ultimately responsible for things like cutting a release (yes, delegation is encouraged but someone needs to herd the cats). At the same time, I do realize that placement is used by more that nova now so nova cores and what's left of the separate placement core team shouldn't be the only ones making this decision.
So, assuming the worst happens and placement is left without a PTL for Victoria, what do we want to do?
I mentioned this on IRC, but just for completeness, there is another option: have the Nova candidate PTL (I assume there is just one) also apply for Placement PTL, and handle the 2 realms in a personal union.
As far as I know I'm the only nova PTL candidate so basically you asking me to take the Placement PTL role as well. This is a valid option. Still, first, I would like to give a chance to the DPL concept in Placement in a way yoctozepto suggested.
Bump. Do we 2-3 developers interested in running the Placement project in distributed project leadership[1] mode in Wallaby?
[1] https://governance.openstack.org/tc/resolutions/20200803-distributed-project...
Cheers, gibi
Ciao
Luigi