Circling back to this entire discussion. Ilya Etingof is starting to propose a revision[0] to the specification that was originally posted in ironic-specs. Given the amount of interest, I think it would be good for this to have higher visibility so interested parties can be involved. While I think it would still be good to have a multiple party discussion to try and help clarify wants/desires and hopefully figure out next steps, I suspect most of that discussion will take place on the specification revision. -Julia [0]: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/672780/ On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 2:39 AM chandra sekhar <sekharvajjula@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Julia, I am based in Finland . Anytime from 8:00 to 19:00 (EEST) is good for me.
Regards Chandra R.
On Tue, 9 Jul 2019, 18:33 Julia Kreger, <juliaashleykreger@gmail.com> wrote:
Greetings everyone!
Over the last few weeks, I've had numerous discussions with contributors who have expressed interest in the DHCP-less deployment method specification document[0].
It seems many parties are interested! I think the path forward at this time is to get everyone talking about where and how they can help push this feature forward.
If those interested could propose time windows when they are available, I'll try to find a mutual time window where we can try to get everyone on IRC or on a call and try to map out the next steps together.
Sound good?
-Julia
[0]: https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/ironic-specs/specs/not-implemented/L3-...