Hi, I Agree with Slawek. The virtual events are perfect to discuss things, but without the salt of personal discussion during the meetings or around the coffee machines :-) So it would be good to have an inüperson event, but with a light agenda. Lajos Slawek Kaplonski <skaplons@redhat.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2023. jan. 11., Sze, 12:09):
Hi,
Hello Neutrinos:
I'm reaching you today to ask you about the PTG. Please first read [1] to have a bit of context. Due to the requests from the contributors to bring back the in person events, there will be a PTG along with the OpenInfra Summit in Vancouver. The virtual PTGs will remain and the first one will be in March.
My main questions here are: 1) What do you prefer: virtual or in-person? 2) For this year, will you attend the virtual PTG only? Or will you attend the Vancouver one too?
In the second question I'm implying that the virtual ones are "mandatory". At least this year those events will be needed to define the roadmap of
Dnia środa, 11 stycznia 2023 11:51:47 CET Rodolfo Alonso Hernandez pisze: the
next releases, same as the previous virtual PTGs we had (please don't forget to order your ticket [2]).
Regards.
[1]
https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2023-January/031645....
Personally I would like to have in-person even and meet again many of Neutron people there. But I know that not all people will want/can travel to Vancouver. So maybe we can have virtual events as the "main" ones and use in-person even in Vancouver for something like "hackfest", "office hours" or something similar. Generally something with less strict agenda and meetings. But that's just my 2 cents :)
-- Slawek Kaplonski Principal Software Engineer Red Hat