Hi Qin,

I have added this topic to the drivers meeting agenda (see on demand agenda close to the bottom): https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NeutronDrivers

Cheers

On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 7:42 PM Dazhong Qin (秦海中)-云数据中心集团 <qinhaizhong01@inspur.com> wrote:

Hi  Miguel,

Thank you for your suggestion. My colleague HengZhou will submit relevant documents as soon as possible in accordance with the official neutron rules.

Yes，we will attend the neutron drivers meeting on January 7th.

Merry Christmas!

Best wish for you!

 

发件人: Miguel Lavalle [mailto:miguel@mlavalle.com]
发送时间: 2021年12月24日 0:43
收件人: Dazhong Qin (秦海中)-云数据中心集团 <qinhaizhong01@inspur.com>
抄送: openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org
主题: Re: Can neutron-fwaas project be revived?

 

Hi Qin,

 

In preparation for your meeting with the drivers team, I suggest we follow as a starting point the Neutron Stadium Governance rules and processes as outlined in the official documentation: https://docs.openstack.org/neutron/latest/contributor/stadium/governance.html. In the past, we have re-incorporated projects to the Stadium, like for example in the case of neutron-vpnaas. This document in the Neutron specs repo summarizes how we assessed the readiness of vpnaas for the stadium: https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/neutron-specs/specs/stadium/queens/neutron-vpnaas.html (https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-specs/+/506012). I suggest you start a similar document for fwaas in the folder for the current cycle: https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/neutron-specs/specs/yoga/index.html. As soon as you can, please push it to gerrit, so we can start reviewing it.

 

Did I understand correctly that you will attend the drivers meeting on January 7th?

 

Best regards

 

Miguel

 

 

On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 8:09 PM Dazhong Qin (秦海中)-云数据中心集团 <qinhaizhong01@inspur.com> wrote:

Hi  Miguel,

I am glad to hear this news. How about our discussion on January 7th, this Friday is not convenient, what do I need to prepare before the discussion, do I need to submit rfe or other descriptions?

 

发件人: Miguel Lavalle [mailto:miguel@mlavalle.com]
发送时间: 2021年12月23日 0:20
收件人: Dazhong Qin (秦海中)-云数据中心集团 <qinhaizhong01@inspur.com>
抄送: openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org
主题: Re: Can neutron-fwaas project be revived?

 

Hi Qin,

 

I think that in principle the community will be delighted if you and your team can reactivate the project and maintain it. Probably the best next step is for you to attend the next Neutron drivers meeting (https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NeutronDrivers) so we can discuss the specifics of your proposal. This meeting takes place on Fridays at 1400 UTC over IRC in oftc.net, channel #openstack-neutron. Due to the end of year festivities in much of Europe and America, the next meeting will take place until January 7th. Is that a good next step for you? If yes, I'll add this topic to the meeting's agenda.

 

Best regards

 

On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 10:29 AM Dazhong Qin (秦海中)-云数据中心集团 <qinhaizhong01@inspur.com> wrote:

Hi：

 The firewall project is a necessary function when the project is delivered. The lack of firewall function after switching OVN is not acceptable to customers. We intend to maintain this project and develop the fwaas driver based on ovn. Whether the neutron-fwaas project can be reactivate? What should I do ?