14 Sep
2020
14 Sep
'20
4:25 p.m.
There's a discussion going on about https://review.opendev.org/#/c/737707/23 , namely about how to handle the new default_types table. My view is that since it simply records a relation between a project and a volume_type, it's not the kind of thing that we need to keep a history of, and entries could be hard-deleted. The current patch keeps a history by introducing an additional is_active column. The additional complexity is worth it if we want to keep a history of this relation, but is not if we don't. Please leave your thoughts on the patch as soon as possible (i.e., in the next few hours) so Rajat can complete this feature. thanks, brian