On 10/30/20 6:31 PM, Wesley Hayutin wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> The tripleo ci team has identified a handful of patches that we'd like
> to land prior to Nov 2, the day docker.io <http://docker.io> goes away.
> We've hit some new bugs and have also tuned a few things to try and
> make sure we can get patches to merge.
>
> Our current focus is across master, victoria, ussuri and centos-8 train,
> and queens while reducing coverage in rocky and stein.
>
> A list of the prioritized gerrit reviews can be found here:
> https://hackmd.io/MlbZ_izSTEuZsCWTJvu_Kg?view
>
> The entire topic can be found here:
> https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:new-ci-job
In that list there are patches to puppet modules and openstack services
what run a single standalone tripleo CI job. I don't think creating an
extra provider job to run a single consumer job sounds reasonable.
>
> Thanks all.
So our first pass there I think should be a content-provider. However we could potentially drop the content-provider and override
docker.io ->
quay.io as well. We are not certain yet how well
quay.io will perform so we're being cautious atm.
or as currently discussing with sshnaidm on irc the job itself can build the containers instead of having a content provider do that
17:38 < sshnaidm|rover> maybe in puppet repos we will just build containers?
17:38 < sshnaidm|rover> it's one standalone job there only, irrc
17:38 < sshnaidm|rover> I think bogdan is right
17:39 < marios> sshnaidm|rover: but is it worth it to special case that? in the end it is still just 'build one
set of containers' does it matter if it happens in a content provider or in the job itself? I
guess it depends how stable are the cotnent providers and the answer is 'not always' ... :/
17:40 < sshnaidm|rover> marios, it will remain one job there, not two
17:40 < sshnaidm|rover> and no need to change layouts, just adding one variable
17:40 < sshnaidm|rover> these repos anyway don't expect to run anything else from tripleo
17:41 < sshnaidm|rover> ~10 repos * N branches, will save us a little work..
17:41 < marios> sshnaidm|rover: ack ... if it is easy enough to have that as special case then OK. and yes
having one job instead of 2 (one content provider) brings its own benefits
--
Best regards,
Bogdan Dobrelya,
Irc #bogdando