On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 8:52 AM Dan Sneddon <dsneddon@redhat.com> wrote:
I had moved on from doing TripleO reviews and was focusing on other
things, so I didn't mind losing my TripleO core status when this email
went out. However I am once again focusing on os-net-config, and I just
realized I have lost my +2/-2 and workflow +1 status on os-net-config.

In order for me to contribute to os-net-config and help to implement the
NetworkManager/nmstate implementation, I may need TripleO core status
again. I would be happy to do regular reviews again in TripleO in order
to maintain that status. Can somebody nominate me for TripleO core status?

I think you just did ;)

+1 for dsneddon to regain core.

He hasn't been dormant for that long (last review there in November [1] ) and over the last 6 months [2] shows up in the list of reviewers.

My 2c:  Dan imho the review count is a little low - would be great if you could try to do 1 review/day across tripleo (pick any repo ;)) now that you're working on os-net-config again. We all need code reviews to keep things moving and you'll be needing reviews from other tripleo cores again soon enough for the work you'll be doing,

regards, marios

[1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-net-config/+/813838
[2] https://www.stackalytics.io/report/contribution?module=opendev.org/openstack/os-net-config&project_type=openstack&days=180

On 11/3/21 09:52, James Slagle wrote:
> Hello, I took a look at our core team, "tripleo-core" in gerrit. We have
> a few individuals who I feel have moved on from TripleO in their focus.
> I looked at the reviews from stackalytics.io <http://stackalytics.io>
> for the last 180 days[1].
> These individuals have less than 6 reviews, which is about 1 review a month:
> Bob Fournier
> Dan Sneddon
> Dmitry Tantsur
> Jiří Stránský
> Juan Antonio Osorio Robles
> Marius Cornea
> These individuals have publicly expressed that they are moving on from
> TripleO:
> Michele Baldessari
> wes hayutin
> I'd like to propose we remove these folks from our core team, while
> thanking them for their contributions. I'll also note that I'd still
> value +1/-1 from these folks with a lot of significance, and encourage
> them to review their areas of expertise!
> If anyone on the list plans to start reviewing in TripleO again, then I
> also think we can postpone the removal for the time being and
> re-evaluate later. Please let me know if that's the case.
> Please reply and let me know any agreements or concerns with this change.
> Thank you!
> [1]
> https://www.stackalytics.io/report/contribution?module=tripleo-group&project_type=openstack&days=180
> <https://www.stackalytics.io/report/contribution?module=tripleo-group&project_type=openstack&days=180>
> --
> -- James Slagle
> --

Dan Sneddon         |  Senior Principal Software Engineer
dsneddon:irc        |  @dxs:twitter