Yes, we do not allow eventlet in Octavia. It leads to a number of conflicts and problems with the overall code base, including the use of taskflow. Is there a reason we need to use the os-ken BGP code as opposed to the exabgp option that was being used before? I remember we looked at those two options back when the other team was developing the l3 option, but I don't remember all of the details of why exabgp was selected. Michael On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 1:18 AM Jeff Yang <yjf1970231893@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Michael, I found that you forbid import eventlet in octavia.[1] I guess the eventlet has a conflict with gunicorn, is that? But, I need to import eventlet for os-ken that used to implement bgp speaker.[2] I am studying eventlet and gunicorn deeply. Have you some suggestions to resolve this conflict?
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/462334/ [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/628915/
Michael Johnson <johnsomor@gmail.com> 于2019年1月5日周六 上午8:02写道：
Hi Jeff,
Unfortunately the team that was working on that code had stopped due to internal reasons.
I hope to make the reference active/active blueprint a priority again during the Train cycle. Following that I may be able to look at the L3 distributor option, but I cannot commit to that at this time.
If you are interesting in picking up that work, please let me know and we can sync up on that status of the WIP patches, etc.
Michael
On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 11:19 PM Jeff Yang <yjf1970231893@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Octavia team: The email aims to ask the development progress about l3-active-active blueprint. I noticed that the work in this area has been stagnant for eight months. https://review.openstack.org/#/q/l3-active-active I want to know the community's next work plan in this regard. Thanks.