Hi all, Since Bifrost is an installation project that supports several distributions, maintaining its stable branches is a never ending nightmare. We have *nearly* fixed Ussuri (thank you Riccardo!) and just started looking into Train (thank you Iury and Mark), I'm sure we cannot keep EM branches in a decent shape. Personally I feel that Bifrost is more geared towards consumers staying close to master, but my gut feeling may not necessarily match the reality. Based on the above, I'm proposing: 1) EOL all old branches from Ocata to Stein on Bifrost. 2) No longer create EM branches, EOL immediately after a branch leaves the regular maintenance. Opinions? Dmitry P.S. Adding kolla because of a potential impact. -- Red Hat GmbH, https://de.redhat.com/ , Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243, Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Brian Klemm, Laurie Krebs, Michael O'Neill