Graham Hayes wrote:
> On 27/06/2019 09:55, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>> I have been considering our GitHub presence as a downstream "code
>> marketing" property, a sort of front-end or entry point into the
>> OpenStack universe for outsiders. As such, I'd consider it much closer
>> to openstack.org/software than to opendev.org/openstack.
>>
>> So one way to do this would be to ask Foundation staff to maintain this
>> code marketing property, taking care of aligning message with the
>> content at openstack.org/software (which is driven from the
>> osf/openstack-map repository).
>>
>> If we handle it at TC-level my fear is that we would duplicate work
>> around things like project descriptions and what is pinned, and end up
>> with slightly different messages.
>
> I am not as concerned about this, the TC should be setting out our
> viewpoint for the project, and if this is in conflict with the message
> from the foundation, we have plenty of avenues to raise it.

How about the TC controls which repo is replicated where (and which ones
are pinned etc), but we import the descriptions from the openstack-map
repo?

That would keep control on the TC side but avoid duplication of effort.
In my experience it's already difficult to get projects to update
descriptions in one place, so two...

Also, who is volunteering for setting up the replication, and then
keeping track of things as they evolve ?

--
Thierry Carrez (ttx)