From the etherpad [1]:
("My" in here is edleafe) * The more we get into the complexities of modeling nested providers, the more it seems to me that we are not using the best technology for this task. My brief experiments with graph databases last year showed a great deal of promise, but the whole extraction process pushed that to the side. * Perhaps we might try some parallel development, where resources are modeled in both relational and graph DBs. Then we might be able to compare the different solutions to complex queries on the same data sets. This is an invitation to discuss other potentially useful technologies, the relative cost of exploring them, and benefits we might get from that exploration (even if we don't end up using the other tech). And anything else anyone else wants to add. [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/placement-ptg-train -- Chris Dent ٩◔̯◔۶ https://anticdent.org/ freenode: cdent tw: @anticdent