26 Nov
2019
26 Nov
'19
4:37 p.m.
On 26/11/2019 09:47, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Zane Bitter wrote:
On 20/11/19 9:21 am, Matt Riedemann wrote:
This is assuming that each project has a stable core team already, which a lot don't, that's why we get a lot of "hi I'm the PTL du jour on project X now please make me stable core even though I've never reviewed any stable branch changes before".
Correct, what I'm suggesting is a middle-ground position so that in the cases where there is no project-specific stable team, that team has to be bootstrapped by the global stable-maint team in the same way that they do already.
That sounds like a reasonable compromise.
Yeah, I like this idea - it allows more flexibility while not chaining the door wide open.