Hello everyone, I'd like to announce my candidacy for Cinder PTL for the Yoga cycle. The primary challenge we face in the Cinder community continues to be that our reviewing bandwidth has declined at the same time third-party driver contributions have not decreased. As I see it, the problem is that many vendors who maintain third-party drivers do not appear to be clear on the concept of community participation. (For what it's worth, I think this is more a manager problem than a developer problem, but the effect on Cinder is the same, namely, lots of request for reviews and not much doing of reviews. The Cinder documentation has information about how to review, how you don't need to be a core to do valuable reviews, etc., but it's not clear that many people have actually read them.) The Cinder community has tried to address this participation deficit in Xena by providing more upstream activities for contributors (for example, the monthly Festival of XS reviews [0] and the weekly Bug Squad meetings [1]), and these have had decent participation. In Yoga, I'd like to explore having some kind of Review Squad meeting to give people a chance to get "live" feedback on features under development. Some people do use the weekly Cinder meeting for this, but not everyone takes advantage of that, plus weekly meeting time is limited. I hate to propose yet another team meeting, but on the other hand, the bug squad and festival of reviews meetings are extremely productive, so I don't mind proposing another *productive* meeting. (We'll simply cancel it if it turns out that people don't take advantage. Also, I'm open to other ideas ... the key issue is providing faster feedback and more visibility for people developing cinder features, and allowing cinder cores to use their review time productively. So two key issues.) On the positive side, we did add a new cinder core during Xena and there's another person right on the verge of being proposed as a core. So that will help address review bandwidth, though I want to stress that non-core reviews are extremely important to the project as well. Our core reviewers also develop features and fix bugs--they are not full-time code reviewers. And the way to become a cinder core is to review widely in the project and demonstrate a good breadth of knowledge of the software. (As always, anyone currently working on cinder project who's interested becoming a cinder core, please contact me (or any of the current cores) to discuss what the expectations are.) Also on the good side is that we've done quite a bit of work on the Cinder CI this cycle. (I'm not going to tempt fate by saying anything more about that.) With respect to the details of Cinder development in Yoga, I expect those to emerge from our virtual PTG discussions in October. You can help set the agenda here: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/yoga-ptg-cinder-planning To summarize, I would like to continue working on improving the review throughput of the Cinder team and find additional ways to get people more thoroughly involved in the project. Thanks for reading this far, and thank you for your consideration. Brian Rosmaita (rosmaita) [0] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Cinder_Festival_of_XS_Reviews [1] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Cinder_Bug_Squad_Meeting